Yes, if the person using the gun had a previous strike on their record then they should be sold for not doing an in depth background check

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree 1 •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

1 Reply

@8TJKDF4 from Virginia commented…3yrs3Y

This is part if the mandatory background check and the dealer and manufacturer legally can’t be part of that process - background checks are managed by the NICS system.

▲▲Reply to this Link •••Agree Disagree Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this answer.

@8FYV8KD

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement biasNo data yetAudience bias0%Active in

PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.