Try the political quiz

255 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If you had to choose between a higher personal income and a more equitable society, which would you choose and why?

 @9HZFDZSfrom Guam answered…4mos4MO

I think education, access to healthcare, and fair economic policies are key. Also, fostering empathy and understanding can help us respect and value our differences.

 @9HZFMY7 from Mississippi answered…4mos4MO

 @9HZFRH7 from Nebraska answered…4mos4MO

more equitable society because it would be more beneficial.

 @9HZGMCX from California agreed…4mos4MO

I would rather be a part of a society that can afford the costs of living rather than having a higher personal income.

 @9HZFMWD from Florida answered…4mos4MO

I would choose a more equitable society as I feel that everyone deserves to have the proper experiences in life such as education, healthcare, and opportunites.

 @9HZKF2P from California disagreed…4mos4MO

A more equitable society does not guarantee "the proper experiences in life such as education, healthcare, and opportunities."

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Imagine a society where wealth is shared according to need; do you feel this is fair, and why?

 @9H7Q5SQ from Iowa answered…5mos5MO

It depends on the situation. If I am working extremely hard and not getting the money I deserve whereas someone else has a lot of money and not doing anything, then no

 @9H7PZYBanswered…5mos5MO

No, this is not fair to the people that have worked hard in order to accumulate their wealth and it should not be taken from the hard workers and given to those which are not willing to put in the effort to work.

 @9H7PH2Y from South Carolina answered…5mos5MO

No, because wealth a lot of times is earned and if people just get money for doing nothing all day then they are getting paid for the wrong reasons.

 @9H7PHCH from Arkansas answered…5mos5MO

Hell no, If I work hard then i'm going to get my pay for it. I don't want to share it with anyone else besides my family.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What impact do you think eliminating interest on loans would have on your family and community?

 @9HTGLZFLibertarian  from New Jersey commented…4mos4MO

Eliminating interest with certainly help a lot of people, but it would also make banks and financial institutions. Not want to make loans, so you'll be out of stalemate.

 @9J59XK2Republican from Idaho answered…4mos4MO

I dont think it would have a good impact. I think the change is unnecessary. The line between good and bad is flexible and ever-shifting. It sounds very appealing to not have to worry about interest, but I believe that it would devistate our current economy. We romanticize the idea of change, not quite realizing that the real issue may be our refusal to be ok with what we already have.

 @9J59BGZ from California answered…4mos4MO

Interest on loans is how banks make money and people just shouldn't take out loans. If you take one you take the risk of paying it off for years.

 @9J594C4Independent  from Iowa answered…4mos4MO

stuff like car and health loans are good since we're getting insurance on that stuff but student loans shouldn't be a thing.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Imagine that your ideal job pays less but contributes more to society. Would you still pursue it, and why?

 @9KW979D from Rhode Island answered…2mos2MO

I would likely not take this job because personally I want to be comfortable and prioritize my freedom from financial stress over the potential contributions.

 @9KW4SR4  from Michigan answered…2mos2MO

I would still pursue it because my ideal job isn't based on how much money I make. Its based on what I wouldn't dread waking up in the morning for, so as long as I could make a comfortable living I would be fine.

 @9KVYT8Zanswered…2mos2MO

I would still pursue it because it's what I enjoy and it's a bonus that I'm getting paid for it.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Should personal success be measured by material wealth or contributions to societal welfare? What would be your ideal metric?

 @9KTBQZ2 from Georgia answered…2mos2MO

I do not think that a person's success should be measured in how rich they are.

 @9KTB9BG from North Carolina answered…2mos2MO

 @9KT9YSKanswered…2mos2MO

Personal success should be measured by the contributions to social welfare.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Would you be willing to trade some personal luxuries for a society with reduced economic inequality?

 @9JT2WT4Republican from Missouri answered…3mos3MO

God no, I believe a person should work for the wealth. I do not believe in sharing the wealth you have made.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas commented…3mos3MO

So like, all workers should have direct ownership over the profits of their own labor, right?

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…3mos3MO

Seriously, people gotta understand what they’re actually advocating for. It’s amazing how often people accidentally support socialism, especially whenever they claim to hate it.

 @9JVFHVB from South Carolina answered…3mos3MO

it depends, but overall yes because if we create/keep an allie with people and trade stuff with them, then they may help us out if we need them

 @9JT2Q65 from Missouri answered…3mos3MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you feel about eliminating interest-based transactions in favor of Islamic socialist economic systems?

 @9H7PPF6 from Kansas answered…5mos5MO

 @9H7PNW2 from South Carolina answered…5mos5MO

I think that the current system would be much better than islamic socialism

 @9H7PHCH from Arkansas answered…5mos5MO

 @9H7PW8L from New York answered…5mos5MO

there is no need for a new economic system, let alone one that only works in a few much smaller countries

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Can you see a place for spiritual values in the economic systems that govern society?

 @9H5PZT4Democrat from New York answered…6mos6MO

t depends on the country and the population and beliefs of said country really. In a country like America it would never work, but the idea isn’t necessarily a bad one depending on the human rights aspect of the government.

 @9H5MNDV from Michigan answered…6mos6MO

It depends on the country and the population and beliefs of said country really. In a country like America it would never work, but the idea isn’t necessarily a bad one depending on the human rights aspect of the government.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If you had the power, would you introduce Islamic socialist principles into your community and why?

 @9H7P9C8 from Iowa answered…5mos5MO

 @9H7NQF9 from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

I would not introduce it because it would lead to many religious conflicts within my community

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How do you think a community-focused lifestyle would affect our planet and its resources?

 @9HVJMMJ from New York answered…4mos4MO

 @9HVJJN7 from West Virginia answered…4mos4MO

I think it would provide more interaction for people which would make for better social skills

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If the acquisition of wealth was less of a focus in society, how do you think that would change interpersonal relationships?

 @9HXXD6FWomen’s Equality from Michigan answered…4mos4MO

 @9HTGLZFLibertarian  from New Jersey commented…4mos4MO

If the acquisition of wealth was not a major fact when people's lives. I think the world would be a calmer place to live.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What emotions do you experience when you think of eradicating poverty through combined religious and socialist efforts?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Can you think of a situation where you’ve felt that sharing was more satisfying than owning, and why did it feel that way?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...