Try the political quiz

283 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

What does it mean for a people to have sovereignty over a land, and how does that concept resonate with you?

 @9KHY9ZL  from Georgia answered…2mos2MO

People need to talk about the origins of people in general. There are so many misconceptions & misguided beliefs of people, everything was mixed up to cover up inheritances especially as an alleged attempt to usurp authority to lands.

 @9KJ3HZS from Iowa disagreed…2mos2MO

This doesn't even answer the question. You're making a statement that is arguing an entirely different point than the question is even asking. It's like the question made you mad and you hate America so much that you wanted to try and prove a point, which you failed to do. Also, the colonization of America was not the first time in the USA that people were overtaken by a more powerful force, pillaged, and plundered. Do your history homework.

 @9KHY9ZL from Georgia commented…2mos2MO

I thank y.o.u & I love y.o.u regardless family, y.o.u just confirmed that I can affirm the initial stance I have. I have no anger towards these questions nor the answers

 @9KHXLQS from California answered…2mos2MO

Palestinians are people. They are the native people of Palestine, not "Israel". Bombing, assassinating, torturing, and displacing said native people is textbook colonization. The idea of Zionism sounds great on paper, however in practice it is malicious in nature. Palestinians have been open to living in harmony with Jewish people, so anti-Semitism is not the issue as Israel wants people to believe.

The issue is that Israel has no intention of living in harmony with Palestinians, but to instead wipe them from existence and claim their land, their culture, and their history as their…  Read more

 @9KMMZHV from Ohio disagreed…2mos2MO

Isreal was home to Jewish nomadic tribes from antiquity. Palestine (philistina) was labeled and formed under the Roman empire as an affront to northern (Israel) and southern (Juda) jewish kingdoms as a means to control them.

 @9KG8LPV from Kentucky answered…2mos2MO

the right and power of a governing body to govern itself, its people and its lands without outside interference.

 @9KG93JL from New York answered…2mos2MO

People are tribal, and feel strong emotional connections to places. As a descendant of immigrants, this concept does not resonate to me. People also want a homeland where they feel safe. As a descendant of Holocaust victims, the concept of a place where Jews can feel fre from persecution resonates strongly with me.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How should one's personal connection to their ancestors' land impact current geopolitical boundaries, if at all?

 @9KW34FQ from California answered…2mos2MO

I feel like in most cases people should be able to keep their ancestors' land.

 @9KZ78SQ  from Virginia disagreed…2mos2MO

To say most cases is bold, I believe that in [some] cases people should be able to keep their ancestors land. If they are natives to the area, they shouldn't be uprooted from their home. Though if a group's ancestors resided somewhere else long before their time, I don't believe they have a right to go to where their ancestors lived and claim it as their own, but I believe they should have a right to at least reside their if it will not bother the current society residing in the land.

 @9KW3MSD from Michigan answered…2mos2MO

you should have the right to inheart the land from your ansestors exactly how they left it

 @9KW3KXB from Illinois answered…2mos2MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How do you perceive your role in supporting or questioning the establishment of homelands for cultural or religious groups?

 @9KVPCBB from California answered…2mos2MO

If it’s part of someone religious practice, it shouldn’t be judged or alienated. Not everyone believes in the same thing, you don’t have to agree with it but you shouldn’t bring harm to it if it isn’t physically harming others.

 @9KVP53R from Michigan answered…2mos2MO

i’m not really interested in foreign wars that have nothing to do with us as a country. yes i understand as a nation its our duty to protect those in need. but at the same time we are spending billions of dollars on a war that shouldn’t be happening. we need to focus on OUR problems rather than some other war 1000s of miles away.

 @9KVP4K4Socialist from California answered…2mos2MO

In my opinion, Zionism itself is extremely harmful and the questioning of it is not anti-semetic. I am supportive of Judaism and Jewish people but the horrible things happening in Palestine are not to be excused by the past struggles of any one group. Many Jewish people not only support Palestine but see Zionism as anti-semetic in and of itself.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

When, if ever, do you believe it's appropriate to intervene in conflicts over territory and identity?

 @9HTT748  from Ohio answered…4mos4MO

Yes, they need to coexist like they had before British rule, if they can't act like adults and settle things peacefully, and if they can't fight without serious moral and human rights violations, we may have to do something about it.

 @9HTSJRQ from Missouri answered…4mos4MO

I believe that genocide is wrong. It is appropriate to intervene when thousands of people are being murdered for their identity and land they reside on. It is embarrassing the UN has allowed this to happen as long as it has.

 @9HTSKYJPeace and Freedom from New York answered…4mos4MO

When innocent children, women, and men are losing their lives for no reason other than genocide

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you feel if you were unable to live in the country of your ancestors?

 @9HN9K4HDemocrat from Washington answered…5mos5MO

I feel like it wouldn't be fair becuase you should be able to be with family.

 @9HN9GX4Peace and Freedom from Washington answered…5mos5MO

 @9HNCJM8Democrat from Connecticut answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Can the establishment of a nation based on religious or historical claims be justified in a modern, multicultural world?

 @9H8NPL9 from Florida answered…5mos5MO

If it promotes lawful and just practices that keeps citizens free and passive.

 @9H8NMPGCommunist from Washington answered…5mos5MO

Not at all, especially in the context of Israel, which staked a claimed to a land that they had no claim to. Israel is a theocratic apartheid state that prioritizes Israeli Jews over the rest of their population. this is unacceptable.

 @9H8NCP6 from Illinois answered…5mos5MO

No , it cannot because that was how it was a long time ago and that didn't work out so well

 @9H8PJPM from Wisconsin answered…5mos5MO

The establishment of a state based on religion and historical claims has been seen many times around the world. Israel is not the only country; other Muslim countries, like Pakistan, were founded for the cause of Islam. Other countries have been founded based on religions such as Christianity, like the US and other English-speaking countries.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How would you feel if your ancestral homeland was claimed by others based on historical and religious connections?

 @9H994YB from Florida answered…5mos5MO

It depends on how much basis they have on the claim and the overall evolution of the land. We also have to consider the old ways people used to be and hold land claims in that regard to different standards.

 @9H999XZ  from Missouri answered…5mos5MO

This question is difficult, as Israel did at one point have claim to the land before being driven out by war. Ultimately, I side with Israel due to their historical and religous claim on the land.

 @9H98SBYRepublican from Illinois answered…5mos5MO

I would feel bad for the people that were hurt in the claiming of the land, but as long as the people that the land was taken from were treated as equals, it would be okay.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How can we ensure history’s tragic events are not repeated when forming new nations?

 @9HN9QFQ from Washington answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How can competing historical narratives about a land shape its future?

 @9HN98QY from Washington answered…5mos5MO

I think that it doesn't really do that but history helps us recognize recurring patterns, identify societal strengths and weaknesses, and learn from past mistakes to build a better future

 @9HN8Z7V from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

It shouldn't matter how a people arrived at a land, they are entitled to peace and should not be forcibly removed

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Is it possible to fully support the rights of one group without infringing on those of another in contests over land?

 @9HN9VRF  from Maryland answered…5mos5MO

This is a very complex issue that can't be fully addressed here but I believe that both sides should engage in peace talks and organizations should be put in place to encourage civil interactions between civilians of both sides. The only way this will ever get better is if both sides can stop seeing the other side as "not human" or unworthy, which can only really come from interacting and understanding. I believe a model that a solution could be based off of is "the Troubles" in Ireland. I also believe that Palestinians whose homes were destroyed should be prioritized in the sense that they should be a priority to be heard at the peace talks and it should be ensured that they receive appropriate housing as soon as possible.

 @9HN9FPS from Texas answered…5mos5MO

yes. I can support Jews and still criticize the actions of Israel against Palestine. the Israelis do not represent all Jews, and many Jews, including Holocaust survivors, condemn Israel for its actions. additionally, there are also Jewish Palestinians.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How would you balance the historical suffering of one people with the current suffering of another in claims to the same land?

 @9H5SJD9 from Ohio answered…6mos6MO

I would try to draw similarities between the two and find the perfect balance between them.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What steps can be taken to respect the rights of all parties involved in a territorial dispute?

 @9HN983S from Oregon answered…5mos5MO

abolish the Israeli apartheid government and control over the area and genocide, 1 state solution of life on both sides

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

What is the strongest emotional argument you could make in favor of or against the establishment of a new nation?

 @9KLKS3Y from Massachusetts answered…2mos2MO

I believe the Jewish should get their homes back, the only reason why they were removed from Israel was due to the Roman Empire removing them from their homeland and proceeding to name that land after their enemies, which is why it is called Palestine to this day. So in essence, the Jewish should be able to obtain their land back.

 @9KLK3LGRepublican from Indiana answered…2mos2MO

The Jewish people deserve their own nation, and I believe that that nation should include Israel.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

In what ways has the search for belonging impacted your life or that of someone you know?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...