The following is a 3 message exchange between 3 users
Here’s a hypothetical for you. Imagine someone’s brain was removed and they were hooked up to a set of machines that kept them biologically alive. Is that a person deserving of rights? In other words, would unplugging the machines be considered murder? What if, instead of a set of machines, the subjects was hooked up to another, unambiguously alive person? What if that person could be harmed? Would that person have the right to end the procedure?
@9B9WG7D1yr1Y
If someone is in a coma (effectively braindead) and I walk in and shoot them, I will be in jail for murder faster than you could imagine.
If I was hooked up to someone without our consent, would I have the right to actively kill them? What about a baby dependent on their mother for literally everything? What about if the child has downs? Gas them because they are a drain on society. You kind of sound like a group I wouldn't want to be associated with.
If there were Siamese twins, would one be allowed to pay a dr to kill the other in any situation? What if they waited a few weeks and there would then be a viable procedure to successfully separate them?
And here I thought women were supposed to be compassionate and if they ruled the world we would have peace.
@9BYHRVG12mos12MO
Amen brother. It's like giving someone anesthetic and then blowing his brains out. Abortion is sheer brutality and everyone knows in their hearts that it is. We have the moral high ground on this issue.
