Try the political quiz

28 Replies

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington disagreed…11mos11MO

Ranked choice voting is a way to rig elections and a system voters do not understand. As for the parties changing, they really haven't, Democrats still support racist alternative action programs that hire based on skin color and Republicans still push for equality of oppurtunity, while you push for equality of outcome.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas commented…11mos11MO

Why would ranked-choice be a complicated system of voting? Many nations already implement this voting method into their elections, so it's not even anything new or radical. It literally just means you rank all the candidates based on which one(s) you like most, instead of voting for a single person and having all of the problems we currently have.

Secondly, I'm pretty sure @5K2PZRB is referring to the party switch, which happened gradually throughout the 20th century, largely surrounding FDR and the Civil Rights Movement against the Republican "southern strategy". It was…  Read more

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington disagreed…11mos11MO

Ranked-choice voting being implemented in Alaska, as a system voters do not understand, significantly swung the political pendulum to the Democrats. Why would we change a system that Americans have used and understood perfectly for 250 years?

Secondly, the party switch theory is a tool left-wing myth -- completely false and ungrounded in reality. Lincoln was openly admiring of the Constitution and Founding Fathers whereas FDR was openly scornful of them. There were a few Republicans who opposed Civil Rights but there were way more Democrats, such as the segregationist Joe Biden, who was openly…  Read more

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas commented…11mos11MO

Why do you insist that it's so difficult to understand? It's literally in the name: ranked choice...you just rank your choices. It's not complicated at all.

And you understand why it swung Democrat, right? Because our currently flawed voting system is designed to maintain the Republican Party; without it, they wouldn't hold as significant of power as they do now. Without the electoral college, Republicans lose; without gerrymandering, Republicans lose; without single-vote plurality voting, Republicans lose; etc. The reason our current, terrible system is maintained the way…  Read more

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington disagreed…11mos11MO

State's Rights is not inherently opposed to Civil Rights -- in fact the very reverse is true. Yet another example of how you haven't the foggiest idea about our history. State's Rights was used as an argument AGAINST slavery and the fugitive slave act, which forced states to turn in runaways, and State's Rights was used to abolish slavery in the North. I have also studied the U.S. presidential elections immensely and I am absolutely certain your party switch theory is false.

@CaucusCalculatorDemocratfrom New York requested a reference…11mos11MO

Please provide a reference for:

Joe Biden, who was openly admiring of the Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard and a ferocious racist

  @TruthHurts101 from Washington commented…11mos11MO

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/07/03/watch-joe-biden-call-kkk-member-and-democrat-robert-byrd-a-friend-and-mentor-n2571780 there's the reference. Check it out. There you go. Enjoy!

 @ar_alan from Pennsylvania commented…11mos11MO

It's essential to distinguish between policies that promote equal opportunity and those that enforce equal outcomes. Equality of opportunity allows all individuals to have a fair shot at success, while equality of outcome seeks to level the playing field by redistributing resources. As for taxation and wealth redistribution, it's important to remember that taxes are necessary for providing essential public services like education, healthcare, and infrastructure. While we may disagree on the ideal tax rates or how best to allocate those resources, the concept of taxation isn't…  Read more

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity3 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement biasNo data yetAudience bias0%Active inPartyDemocraticLocationNew York, NY