Couldn't help but notice my argument about human nation left you speechless. I schooled you.

"You assume the government will act of noble motives..."

lol another strawman. No, I absolutely do not. I believe the only way a government can be genuinely just or beneficial is if the government IS the public. "A government" is simply the decision-making body of a society, and I would argue that the only just way for any group of people to make decisions is via direct democracy, where where all people share equal decision-making power, with no oligarchic so-called "representatives" to make decisions for us. Our current governmental system is terrible, anti-democratic, and blatantly anti-society.

THAT'S my real position, not whatever it is you keep making up...

"...which is assuming you can perfect the greedy, selfish nature..."

Again, this doesn't even make sense, nor is it anything I mentioned. What does it even mean to "perfect greed" anyway..? Not only is this another strawman, but it's also just a dumb one lol.

I would never claim to "perfect" anything, I simply advocate that we create a system that does not blatantly incentivize and encourage negative qualities such as greed or selfishness, like what capitalism does. If greed is bad (it is), then we should have a system that disincentivizes it, duh...

"By assuming that the very negative qualities you despise in the rich will not be present in the GOVERNMENT..."

lol more strawmanning. I am against ALL private interests, both economically AND politically, because I believe that all people are entitled to ownership, and a say, in their own lives and communities and workplaces.

That is where YOU are a hypocrite, as you claim to be "anti-state" because you don't think the government should take from their citizens, yet you also claim to support capitalism because you DO think bosses should take from their workers.