So you're not actually "anti-state", because clearly you still believe it should exist to uphold military/police presence, uphold laws and legal contracts, likely some form of a court or judiciary system to enforce them, etc...right? So like I suggested in another reply, you're not actually "anti-state", you're just some form of a Libertarian-Capitalist. You still want a state to exist, you would just disagree with others over the extents of what they should have/do, but you're not ideologically nor fundamentally "anti-state".

Also, things that are considered "crimes" are defined BY the state, whether we think they're justly so or not, so it doesn't make sense to claim that things like government regulation are "crimes". You can think it's bad or wrong (I would disagree, to an extent), but claiming they are "crimes" is just an ignorant misunderstanding of socio-political ideology and philosophy...