Please no logical fallacies though and ensure your sources are credible."
lol this literally already is a logical fallacy. You cannot prove anything does NOT exist, only whether or not it DOES exist...it's called unfalsifiable. That's exactly why the burden of proof is on the person claiming X does exist, not on the person who doubts the claims. YOU have to provide objective evidence to prove that a god (your god, specifically, since that is your claim) even exists in the first place. As it stands there is no reason to even assume that a god does exist, which is why YOU have to provide the evidence to support your claim that one does, because until then, there's literally no reason to believe it is any more than a mythology. This is simple debate 101...
Be the first to reply to this comment.