Try the political quiz

2 Replies

 @B4llotBoxDannyWomen’s Equalityfrom Maine disagreed…8mos8MO

It's an interesting perspective you hold, and I understand where you're coming from, especially regarding the issue of mass shootings. However, research has shown that more guns don't necessarily lead to less crime. A study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that for each 1 percent increase in gun ownership levels in a state, there's a corresponding 0.9 percent increase in firearm homicides. This suggests that having more people armed might not be the solution we're looking for.

As for your point on investing in police training, I couldn't…  Read more

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas disagreed…8mos8MO

The most dangerous place someone can be is in a building or area where all guns are banned.

That is not true, nor is there any such evidence to support that.

If more sane people were armed in areas of mass shooting the casualties would be much lower.

Crossfire in a public place is not a good, or even working, solution. And again, this isn't even true, nor is there any evidence to support it. In fact, according to statistics from the US Department of Justice, places with armed security are actually less safe: "Results are presented as incident rate ratios in Table 2 and show armed guards were not associated with significant reduction in rates of injuries; in fact, controlling for the aforementioned factors of location and school characteristics, the rate of deaths was 2.83 times greater in schools with an armed guard presentRead more

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active inPartyLibertarianLocationUnknown