“Many of the more traditional leadership traits, particularly from the authoritative domain, frankly don't help much as president. You're at the head of what is essentially the largest employer in the United States, and the reality is you delegate more than act independently.”

I completely understand the sentiment behind your words, and I admire your perspective. Yet, I beg to differ on a certain point. While delegation and support are indeed significant aspects of leadership, I believe that a certain degree of authoritative traits can be beneficial, even in a presidency.

For instance, consider the example of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who served as the U.S. President during the Great Depression and World War II. His strong authoritative leadership was instrumental in implementing the New Deal policies and leading the nation during a time of crisis. His ability to mak…  Read moree tough decisions, often independently, arguably helped America navigate through those difficult times.

However, I also understand that an overly authoritative approach can be problematic, potentially leading to a lack of collaboration or understanding. It's a delicate balance. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Could there be a way to strike a balance between authoritative leadership and empathetic, supportive leadership? How do you think such a balance can be achieved?