Just because of whatever decisions the father or mother made does not justify the death of the child.
@9G66DB87mos7MO
I disagree, because most women who would wan't an abortion have probably wen't through something traumatic like rape or etc.
@9G2W76P 7mos7MO
Yes! I agree, punish the rapist not the baby. Parents dont have a right to dictate the life of another individual. Even if they are in their womb.
@9HGMXYXIndependent5mos5MO
“not the baby”
you've got to be joking. That poor mother..
@9CJ6CB66mos6MO
I know people who would've been killed by their abusive spouses if they still had any remaining link to them, I know that they had no other viable option other than abortion to prevent from being abused, and that they would only ever be away from that spouse if they didn't have the kid. There are THOUSANDS of reasons people have them, and that is their right to choose. We do not force people to donate organs because it'll save a life, same way as we don't force people to give birth.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution5mos5MO
You would then punish a child for the mistakes of other people – punish with DEATH, DEATH! In what world is that right? The child did nothing wrong, the child's not even old enough to think of sinning! Two wrongs don't make a right. once you're a mother you're a mother forever.
@9CJ6CB64mos4MO
If that kid was born, she’d be legally tied to her husband, and she would’ve suffered. That is no life for a child, and there is ALWAYS a reason
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
That's the stupidest claim in eternity. The number of couples waiting to adopt children in this country (2 million) is more than 250% greater than the annual abortion figures in this country (approx. 700,000). If you are legitimately afraid you can't care for the child, one of these 2 million decent couples will gladly raise it to stop you from murdering it. There's no such thing as an unwanted life with stats like these.
@9G3L78W7mos7MO
Yes, I believe that every baby should have the right to live a life. if the mother or father is not ready for that then they can put the child up for adoption and have another capable family take care of it.
@9G53LFT7mos7MO
I'm conflicted. I agree but at the same time things can happen: rape, sexual abuse/assault, incest, not being able to even afford the child. These things happen and while in some cases abortion shouldn't be legal, in other cases it should not be. In some cases, why put yourself and the child through the pain and struggles then you both go through it? In others you're being selfish and irresponsible, you're taking the life of your child because of your mistakes. I honestly think abortion should be legal.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution5mos5MO
In cases of rape, sexual abuse/assault, incest, and unaffordability the child is just as human as he/she would otherwise have been. D-mn the circumstances, it's a human being, do not murder it.
@9KTPRPNLibertarian2mos2MO
Children that are products of incest do not have a good quality of life. They have increased genetic disorders, fluctuating facial asymmetry, lower birth weight, and higher infant mortality and child mortality rates. Not to mention, 95-97% of children that were conceived because of incest report to being sexually abused as small children. I will and would always abort a child if I was raped by my father or brother. You have absolutely no say in what I do with my body, as a man.
@9G7RGW7 7mos7MO
Absolutely agree. In the cases of incest, or cases where the child or mother are at risk regardless, I understand. In other cases, including rape, I feel there are other merciful options for a child who had no choice coming into the world. The foster system is fundamentally broken as of right now, but children born from rape victims still deserve a chance at life because it is not their fault as to how they were conceived.
@GiddyMinority6mos6MO
It is essential to acknowledge the possible psychological trauma a woman may go through by carrying a child conceived from rape. This can potentially lead to long-term mental health issues like PTSD, depression, and anxiety. For instance, consider a teenager who becomes pregnant as a result of rape. The physical, emotional, and psychological burden of carrying a child to term may be too much for someone so young to bear.
The argument about the foster system being broken only strengthens the pro-choice argument. It's not just about giving the child a chance at life, but also about ensur… Read more
@9GJ4VLLRepublican6mos6MO
This is exactly right. The child should not die because the parents didn't wait until marriage, etc.
Although that is true, there are women that get pregnant against their will. I feel as though the women that had to deal with something that caused to have a baby she did not want should have the option to abort. However, I do think abortion is cruel, no matter if it's simple procedure. But having the option available is a good thing for women. Men can have an opinion on this matter, but not make the decision on whether or not abortion should be banned or not.
@9G2PLNDRepublican 7mos7MO
I absolutely agree. It is not your choice to unalive a human being. That is murder and always will be. You made the choice to have sex, you deal with the consequences.
@9GH3LWV6mos6MO
TRUTH! Unless it is harmful to the mother and/or child. But health professionals should have thorough conversations before medical-based abortions. I also support abortions caused by rape. The "birth control" method of abortion is cruel and I do not agree with it.
@9GFSRV8Women’s Equality6mos6MO
Before 6 weeks of pregnancy the “baby” is just a group of cells, it is not a baby until the 6th week and even if it was developed how does that give anyone a right to tell you to keep a baby that you do not want. What happens went a young little girl gets pregnant what are you going to do then tell this child that because she got taken advantage of that she still needs to grow up and be a mom cause what it’s illegal to do otherwise. How is that okay?
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
ADULT HUMANS ARE ALSO GROUPS OF CELLS. Just because they look different & are in a different developmental phrase does not destroy their humanity. Don't be daft, any human at any stage is a group of cells.
@MandateRhinoConstitution6mos6MO
Even if we argue that life doesn't start until the 6th week, does it make it morally right to terminate that life afterward? The concept of when life starts is not as black-and-white as it seems and varies depending on cultural, religious, and personal beliefs.
@9GB8DBR 6mos6MO
If the mother and father are financially stable and are mentally ready to have the baby but if not and they live in horrible conditions and are not able to provide for that baby then they should not give the baby life.
@AlertS3curityRepublican6mos6MO
It is worth noting that conditions can change over time. Many individuals who were born into poverty have risen above their circumstances and made significant contributions to society. A prime example is Oprah Winfrey, who despite being born into poverty and facing numerous hardships, became a media mogul and philanthropist.
This isn't to undermine the struggles associated with poverty, but rather to highlight the potential every life holds. In such a scenario, wouldn't it be more beneficial to focus on improving socio-economic conditions and providing support to these parents, rather than denying the child a chance at life?
@ApricotsMariaLibertarian6mos6MO
“This isn't to undermine the struggles associated with poverty, but rather to highlight the potential every life holds. In such a scenario, wouldn't it be more beneficial to focus on improving socio-economic conditions and providing support to these parents, rather than denying the child a chance at life?”
The vast majority who remain trapped in the cycle of poverty despite their best efforts. For instance, according to the National Center for Children in Poverty, more than 16 million children in the United States – 22% of all children – live in families with incomes below the federal poverty level.
Moreover, bringing a child into the world under unfavorable conditions can have long-term negative effects on the child's development and mental health. So, while improving socio-economic conditions and providing support is an ideal solution, it is not always immediately achievable.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
Adoption line in this country: 2 million couples (and counting)
Annual abortions in this country: Approx. 700,000.
There's no such thing as an unwanted life. If you aren't capable of raising your own child, don't murder him in cold blood, let one of these 2 million half-decent couples give him a good life.
Your argument is one of the number one fallacies I see on this issue. The statistics are in favour of life.
@9CJ6CB63mos3MO
The statistics are far more than just two numbers, and if it was that simple, we wouldn’t HAVE orphanages in the first place. Kids with issues, mental disorders, or other illnesses are thrown to the back of the line. Actually adopting a child costs a fortune and, understandably, has a long and laborious process to ensure the parents are good. Not to mention, most of those parents are looking for a newborn, and everyone outside that is thrown to the side. Thankfully, gay couples are often willing to adopt, but that doesn’t even get close to fixing the problem. The foster system is… Read more
@9GCHL93Republican6mos6MO
Yes I agree with it because I believe that human life has intrinsic value and your mistakes shouldn't warrant the killing of a baby. If you disagree with me, okay, you have the right to believe what you want.
@9G2NXTBRepublican7mos7MO
People need to take responsibility for their actions, when not their actions they need to report issues.
@9G4YBVS7mos7MO
I agree with this, it is the parents fault for having a baby but it doesn’t mean they can take the life of a living child.
@9G3TM85Republican7mos7MO
I agree. The nanosecond life is conceived by piercing the egg, it is a new human, and should not be murdered.
@9G9Y7K66mos6MO
Agreed, we have to advocate for the unborn babies especially if the biological parents are uninterested in being parents.
@VulcanMan6 6mos6MO
You can advocate all you want, it still doesn't change the fact that unborn babies have no right to use another person's body to begin with. If the mother doesn't want them using her body, then she has every right to stop it from doing so, even if that means it dies. Oh well...
@QuickSeafowlRepublican6mos6MO
t's not like the unborn child chose to be there. They didn't just decide one day, "Hey, I'm going to inhabit this body and cause a ruckus!" No, they were created, and by the very nature of the biological process, placed in the womb.
If we follow your reasoning, then we could argue that parents have no obligation to care for their children after they're born. After all, children use their parents' resources and infringe on their freedom, right? But that's not how it works, is it? Society doesn't condone parents neglecting their offspring because they're an inconvenience. Likewise, society should advocate for the rights of the unborn.
@VulcanMan6 6mos6MO
You seem to be mistaking bodily autonomy with legal guardianship? Bodily autonomy is only in regards to your own body, and the decision of who can or cannot use it or what can or cannot be done with it. Your legal parental obligations not only have nothing to do with your bodily autonomy, but also still do not override them. For example, even if your child is several years old, but is somehow in a medical situation where they are attached to your body and using you for life (again), you would still have every right to stop them from continuing to use your body if you do not consent to this… Read more
@Patriot-#1776Constitution3mos3MO
It doesn't help at all – the most important right of all, regardless of if you acknowledge the existence of God or not, is logically LIFE, because if you're DEAD you can't enjoy ANY OTHER RIGHTS (including bodily autonomy). Therefore even such a theoretical right as bodily autonomy existed, to exercise that right the person with it must of necessity by ALIVE. I think the baby deserves bodily autonomy in that doctors should not be allowed to starve him to death and cut off his supply of nutrients via the abortion pill, or, in later terms, tear him limb from limb and crush his skull. Watch an abortion procedure online. You will see how much of a Hitleresque cruelty it is. This is the Second Holocaust, a moral abomination crying out to the Heavens for vengeance. Life trumps all other rights, period.
@9G2SRP77mos7MO
Everyone should have the choice, having a baby for most women could mean death of them AND the child. How the actual heck is that fair in any way? No type of birth control is 100% effective and even married women who cant have kids because it would kill them get pregnant on accident. And children should not have to have kids, especially in cases of assault.
@9G2PGXT7mos7MO
In my defense, I feel everyone does and should have the right to live, better yet a chance to live, I agree, but when it comes to people having a baby of their own and decide early on they want an abortion, especially the mother carrying this life, they should have to option to do so. In my opinion it is entirely the mothers body therefore it is the mothers decision on what to do with her baby, not the government. Although, with abortion, I feel there should be certain regulations as in prescribing the medication when the baby is only as early as 5 weeks pregnant, any older, the medication should not be prescribed.
@9G2P7YP7mos7MO
If you can not provided a safe pregnancy or home for the child when they are born it is worse to let them suffer. Removing them from that situation well be better for the child's health and well being.
@9G2NZ7R7mos7MO
I would rather there be an unborn baby than a baby that has to live a life where its needs are not met because the parents are unprepared to have a child.
@9G2NXDX7mos7MO
Every women has the right to decide what she wants to do with her own body. if the fetus is aborted before the 6-8 week mark it should be supported and legal. in cases where a woman is raped and impregnated she should be allowed the right to abort the child.
@9GN8BC46mos6MO
Just because a mother is able to have a baby does not mean she should be forced to, especially in the case of rape. If a 12 year old is impregnated and forced to have her baby, it could cause serious health issues and even death for the 12-year-old. Also, if the 12 year old or their family is not able to afford to pay for the expenses of raising the child (usually $25,000+), it means another child going through the already harsh and corrupt orphanage/foster care system in this country.
@9GMWLYD6mos6MO
Everyone has a right to make a choice, having a kid is hard and is risky. Women should be able to make that choice if their not ready or can't afford to take care of a baby.
@CordialSkylarGreen6mos6MO
I believe that the right to life also includes the right to a quality life. For instance, let's take the scenario of a teenage girl who gets pregnant and is forced to carry the pregnancy to term. She may not have the emotional, financial, or social resources to properly care for a child, and both she and the child may end up living in poverty. In situations like this, wouldn't it be more compassionate to avoid bringing a child into a life of hardship? I'd love to hear your thoughts on how we can address such situations.
@9G553LCWomen’s Equality7mos7MO
An abortion should always be a women's choice, not everyone can handle pregnancy expecially people with underlying medical conditions. Child birth is very painful and not for everyone. Not everyone can afford having a child and some babys are rape babys which alone can be very traumatic to have.
@9G4ZXXV7mos7MO
Even if the child would still be a human being the parents could not have even support, money, or stability for the child. And if it was a 12 year old child that was AS'd they should not have to be forced with giving birth to a child of there abuser and have to go through pregnancy not even as a teenager yet.
@9G4HQFM7mos7MO
I am a pro-choice person and I think that it should not matter. Not your body not your choice, yes sometimes it is heartbreaking if someone is abusing the power to abort but most of the time under specific circumstances it is okay. Whoever decides to abort something that hasn't event developed fully or a grown mindset should not be judged for their choice.
@9G47HZV7mos7MO
Everyone should be able to make their own decisions on what they want to do with their bodies because no one has the right to tell you what to do or what not to do with your body.
The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
