During the first 3 months the child does not have an actual heartbeat only the cardiovascular muscle starting to move without a heart formed.
@9G3VYLN7mos7MO
The so said clump of cells is still a life form. People you mourn a miscarriage, that is a life form. If you decide to have sex, face your consequences and have the baby. You do not have the right to kill a human being. That is murder, which then ends people up in prison.
@9G5PWHX7mos7MO
The life has already been created. you are ending the life of your own child. it doesn't matter how old they are or how far along they are, one life begins taking it away is awful. Don't have sex if you cant deal with the consequences.
@9G3YZD67mos7MO
It doesn't matter. It's not okay to kill the child because of that. You are interrupting the child growing into a full grown human being. Without your disturbance, they will do just that.
@9G3VXD77mos7MO
I believe a child is a child since day one. That child could have a bright future and for you to kill it would rob the kid of its future.
@9G3WYR67mos7MO
should we then be able to legally kill people who rely on a machine to keep their heart pumping? I think that if left to natural causes, human life will happen, therefore it should not be killed.
@VulcanMan6 7mos7MO
If the owner of the machine withdraws consent for someone to use it, then they would likely have the right to pull the plug, since the machine is their property; in the same sense, if the mother withdraws consent for someone to use her body (even a fetus), then they would have the right of bodily autonomy to terminate the pregnancy, since her body is her "property", in the terms of this analogy.
@9G4HGWG7mos7MO
I believe life starts at conception and the first thing that forms is in fact the brain and nervous system which shows there is a life.
@9G444YT7mos7MO
I think that any child who is born into this world should be given a fighting chance. The reason is that the parents of the child should be given the final decision if they want to continue to push for life for their kid or if it’s to emotionally and physically hurting them.
@9G43CGS7mos7MO
Life begins at conception. Trying to say a baby isn't truly alive until the 3 month mark is major copium for people who just want to be able to abort a baby due to an accidental or unplanned pregnancy. I believe every child should be given a fair chance. Even kids who grow up impoverished can grow into something fantastic.
@9G3WKSG7mos7MO
You would still be taking away a child from this world and even if it was a "accident" its your responsibility to make sure that stuff shouldn't happen so its on you. so don't take it out on the innocent child. Plus there are alternatives like adoption or fostering, and I will admit those options aren't always the best but the child would still be alive.
@9G4RMC57mos7MO
It is still a living thing meaning you are basically commiting murder because it is going to become a human as it grows.
@9G4WNRW7mos7MO
I am Pro-Life. I think this is more important because its still a living organism inside of you. I don't care if you have been raped because that is not okay for someone to take away a baby's choice of life.
@9G44QYQ7mos7MO
While the child's heart does not beat, the child is being developed and will become an adult at some point.
@9G47LBQ7mos7MO
Whether it has a heartbeat or not it is still a living organism with a Chance of life and taking that away should be illegal.
@VulcanMan6 7mos7MO
Bugs are living organisms too, so who cares...
@9G46VYY7mos7MO
Human life does not start with a heartbeat. All life begins with the conception of living cells including humans who begin living with the fertilized egg.
@VulcanMan6 7mos7MO
And what does that have to do with anything..?
@9G3Z2Y37mos7MO
It is a baby and even if the baby is conceived because of rape they can put that baby up for adoption not kill it because it inconveniences the mother.
@9G3XQR57mos7MO
In the bible it says "do not murder" Even though it is not an actual person yet it is still manslaughter because you are CHOOSING to kill someone.
@NomineeP4nda7mos7MO
Interesting point, but did you know that a fetus's heart actually starts to beat around the 22nd day after conception? This is well within the first month. The argument that there's no 'actual' heartbeat during the first three months seems a bit dismissive of this biological fact. What are your thoughts on this? How would you address this in your argument for the 3-month threshold?
@9G3V6TXRepublican7mos7MO
The cardiovascular system is the heart and just because all of the child isn't developed yet there is a child developing from day 1.
The historical activity of users engaging with this agreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
