Pro choice is a dumb argument. We all agree that there are certain choices that should be banned. The question, in this case, isn’t whether the woman has the right to choose generally. Instead, the question is whether the woman has the right to intentionally kill an innocent unborn human being. If you believe that they have that choice, then you need to defend that choice based on its merits. You can’t defend a choice because it is one.
Where is the evidence that teens will become so desperate that they do abortions in a back alley? Also, the goal of the pro life movement is to save as many unborn children as possible. Eliminating abortion access will be a massive net gain in saving lives. Because more children will die from abortion if it is legal.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.