Tolerating abortion in any form is not an option so reducing the amount of abortions isn't a morally viable solution as it doesn't seek to end all abortions.
@9GNP8766mos6MO
Some people get raped and don't want a child. People who are involved in rape, incest or if the birth of the child is a danger to the child and or mother, then they should be able to get an abortion. But people who are having sex without protection and get pregnant, should have the responsibility to keep the child that they decided to not prevent
@9GNPFVW6mos6MO
I agree that with the whole statement until the part about ending all abortions because some are a needed medical procedure.
@9GNWPXK6mos6MO
Yes I agree with this statement because when you have an abortion you are killing innocent fetuses which are living organisms and we were all once a fetus. So we should end all abortions.
@9GNPCR66mos6MO
If morals are the core component that the opposition holds, then the same could be said about the atrocities that may have contributed to an unwanted pregnancy such as rape. The problem isn't abortion, its the uneducation and violence that causes them to come to an abortion.
Abortion is the act of aborting a fetus, which isn't even a human yet. You would not be taking a human life, you would be preventing the making of one. Abortion is necessary, we must put existing life over potential life. The child does not care if it's going to die, it's not a child, it's not alive, you're not killing a child. You're prioritizing the life and well-being of the mother. Point blank period. Some people cannot afford to have kids, and some don't want kids. And that is okay. (Also men do not get a say in abortion. Are you the one carrying the child? Yea didn't think so. Just go find another girl who actually wants kids you freak.)
@VulcanMan6 6mos6MO
Yes or no, does anyone have the right to use your body without your consent? If no, then you understand why an unborn child does not have the right to its mother's body if she doesn't want it there, hence why abortion is justified and good.
@9GNQTKR6mos6MO
Abortions should be legal for a certain amount of time along the scheduled apportionment of its out of that time period but after the time periods up there is very little excuses (mother dying, rape, ect) to the abortion
@9GNPYL36mos6MO
The entire premise is incorrect, as the termination of a pregnancy does not involve taking a human life. A fetus is not a human life. Furthermore, intolerance of abortion will only push people towards more dangerous and unsafe methods.
@9GNPF7Z6mos6MO
This point kind of contradict itself. Your right, stopping safe abortions doesn't stop all abortions. When you take away this procedure you are just giving women and young girls the option to perform it themselves. So many women harm themselves because of the child inside of them. If you say an unborn child's life matters then so do the woman who carries them. Unless you or the government decide to provide for these children or welcome these women with open arms then you DON'T get to decide what they do with their body.
@9GNNZ9T6mos6MO
Yes I Agree, because #1, people need to respect themselves by not getting themselves into these situations, and #2, based off of my religious beliefs and law, murder is wrong
The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
