There are better options that should be prioritized over abortion

Pregnancy can be dangerous for a woman’s health, a woman shouldn’t risk her life for a child she knows she won’t care for or want, therefore abortion is necessary.

There are already many children around the world looking for families to adopt them. Forcing mothers, some of whom may suffer significant health consequences by giving birth, to complete their pregnancies will cause unnecessary deaths and bring more parentless children into the world.

There is adoption available yes, however some children who are victims of SA or Unconstitutional sex may not be able to survive either. Abortion would be their best bet. Even then some pregnancy can have major problems in itself.

Those who are undergoing an “unwanted pregnancy” should be given the right to choose what is best for their mental, physical and emotional health. Many people do not wish to carry the burden of an assault through the “life” of another organism. The foster/adoption system is extremely corrupt and if that person chooses not to go through that option should be allowed to choose.

i think for those who are having an unwanted pregnancy should have the right to give birth and also abort it if necessary in term of health concerns.Other than that surrogacy is a personal choice of an individual.A mother who cannot survive a pregnancy can have the access through an adoption.

The adoption and foster care systems are already filled with abuse and mistreatment. What is the point of forcing women to go through unimaginable pain for hours on end and cause irreversible damage and change to a woman's body? and what about the women who get pregnant via rape. 1 in 6 women will be assaulted in their lives, would you really force a girl to take care of and nourish a fetus formed by one of the worst events in her life? without abortion options women wouldn't stop getting abortions they would have to get more dangerous abortions putting them in even more danger.

For many women who get abortions it may not be their first choice, they may be victims of rape, children themselves, unable to financially have the child or are in a relationship where the husband wont allow them to use birth control, their body cannot physically support a baby, they are struggling with substance abuse, or in a dangerous living situation. Regardless sometimes the best thing for the mother and the baby is to not have the child and that is the choice she has to make.

A pregnant person's pregnancy is their priority above all other considerations, even if it isn't a priority to you. If they reach the painful conclusion that the pregnancy is unsupportable (whether for medical or personal reasons), their access to medical support in such a stressful time should be prioritized. They shouldn't have to get your permission to address their health emergency. By what justification would you rob another person of their bodily autonomy? If you think that they cannot be trusted to make good decisions on their own, do you think that compelling them to become parents is really a strong move?

Unfortunately, you’re wrong. the priority here is the already living breathing woman-
Not the parasitic, unwanted, leech of a spawn inside her.
Another woman’s desire does not overule another’s suffering.
The population right is through the roof. Let her have her right to choose.

Abortion is not someone inherently wants, not one women purposely and consciously gets pregnant for the sole reason to have a baby. There are pregnancies that are also dangerous not just for the fetus but as the mother as well, and the only safe option being abortion. To claim the mother of someone that does not want to keep their child as a surrogate only degrades the mother, and labels her as an awful person.

there is a lot of reasons someone could be getting an abortion and it is everyone's right to have there on decision because getting an abortion could possibly even be what is best for everyone.

Of course, there are better options than abortion. However, it is the woman's right to choose. They are undergoing the process, therefore, gives them an undeniable inclination. A person's body, and extension of that, is up to that person and that person alone. Potential is nothing compared to right.

Although that is a great option. Those wanting to undergo the procedure are most likely endangered and cannot carry through with the pregnancy or they cannot afford to carry out to term. Those who are considering an abortion should have the right to make their own decision.

Sometimes, it isn't about wanting the child or not being able to afford it. It can also be about staying alive. For many people, pregnancy is something that they can die from, and will if they don't get an abortion. While those options are good for people who aren't trying to abort for medical reasons, they aren't an option for those who are.

A lot of people don't have the financial resources to afford prenatal care or the cost of giving birth. Also pregnancy takes a toll on someone's body and mind. Also there are already so many kids in the foster care system.

Women should have complete bodily autonomy; if they wanted to go forward with a pregnancy and avail themselves of these options, they already can.

There is no better option than providing personal choice for one's medical decisions off the table. There is an important difference between religious intervention in public morality and the right to personal choice in one's own life. There is no possible explanation for insisting on the forced birth of an unwanted child. Those who stand for this kind of fascist legalism as a matter of religious morality are also not willing to face the consequences of their unholy demands as unwanted children grow up to be a detriment to society in general.

the entire debate over abortion is about the act of carrying the child, forcing that on a person defeats the entire point of the argument. it isn't about where the child ends up in this case, its about the process.

What about women who are raped? For example, a young girl would be forced to have a child her body may not be ready to produce.

If this were a circumstance where the woman was raped or a victim of incest how could you give that child to someone else knowing that it could be inbred. At the early stages of pregnancy the embryo would have no feeling.

People should have the choice to have a baby or not it is not your baby it is not your responsibility and it isn't your choice but the mothers choice on what she wants for herself.

Abortion should not have been made illegal because of rape, unwanted pregnancy's, and unready mothers.

I don't know all I know is that all abortion should be allowed, a women should be allowed to decide whats best for her. The government shouldn't control her body choices.

Surrogacy should be illegal imo

I agree, we should not kill the child, we should give it a chance, give it the opportunity to live a happy life.

I would have to agree, I am against abortion as no matter the circumstance it is a live human being and deserves a chance at life.

I believe that life does not begin until the baby at least has limbs or any other strong indication that they will be successfully born a healthy breathing infant, so I believe all the decisions should be left to the woman carrying the fetus. Whatever they think is best for themselves and the unborn fetus should be what happens. There are numerous circumstances as to why someone can not have a baby e.g. financial status, health conditions, unsafe environments, etc, and forcing someone to have the child despite any of this is cruel and unjust.

While individuals can be informed of the surrogate process, this option should not be prioritized over abortion. Pregnancy and birth delivery can be very painful processes, and individuals should have the opportunity to choose what they want to do with their bodies. Even in the case that an individual is informed of the surrogate option, they may not want to give birth and that choice/decision should be honored and recognized. Especially for those undergoing unwanted pregnancy, giving birth can be not only physically scarring, but also emotionally traumatic.

No, regardless of the surrogacy idea it is still a woman’s choice with what they wants to do with their body. Mistakes and things happen that does not mean you should be forced and obligated to obey these rules. Giving birth isn’t an easy thing, forcing a woman to do so is insanity. However other options are still good but a woman should be able to choice whether she wants to abort or resort to the other options.

A women should only be allowed to abort the baby if she is raped, or in a situation where it wasn’t wanted. If it was planned then she has to have it.

A woman's body is her own and she should NEVER be forced to subjugate it to serve someone else's will. That is pure slavery. Shame on every person allowing this to continue in the United States!!! This country is no longer free. "Land of the free, home of the brave" my *** !! We might as well be living in a dystopian novel.

its a womans body he choice u cant tell ppl what to do with their bodies, if she wanna keep it then let her, if she wanna abort that baby let her

Then the mother may have to live through the potential guilt of putting up that baby for adoption. Getting an abortion is the simpler option and should be available.

it all depends on how far along the woman is and why she wants to get one. if she is sick and does not want to do something to the baby, if she was raped, or if she has something going on that can get passed to the baby and she doesn't want to pass it to the baby. with the how far long, if the baby has a heart beat that would be murder but if the baby doesnt have a heart beat then the fetus would not be murdered.