Try the political quiz

9 Replies

 @9H35HJR from Connecticut answered…6mos6MO

depends o the situation but in some cases focusing on treatment rather than punishment can be more effective in addressing addiction and helping individuals get back on track

 @9H3597M answered…6mos6MO

Yes, I do believe they should receive treatment. If they were non-violent, then they should be given treatment to fight their addiction.

 @9H34R8X from Georgia answered…6mos6MO

 @9H357YH from Connecticut answered…6mos6MO

I think they should receive treatment and incarceration. Drugs have been proved to have negative effects on people and to prevent it spreading to the younger generations, drug offenders should be treated and put into incarceration to show a more strict stance against drugs. The younger generation is the hope for the future of our country and we shouldn't expose them to illegal drugs since it would prevent them from being the best version of themselves.

 @9H35422Republican from North Carolina answered…6mos6MO

 @9H354GKanswered…6mos6MO

They should receive treatment rather than incarceration because they are non-violent

 @9H35GLW from Ohio answered…6mos6MO

No they should not. They have still used illegal drugs, which are grounds for incarceration. Just because they were non-violent in one situation does not mean they will continue to be non-violent.

 @9H356YVRepublican from Connecticut answered…6mos6MO

Yes, because they haven't done anything wrong they just have an issue with using drugs.

 @9H35NXS from Florida answered…6mos6MO

If the person has truly done nothing to hurt someone than he shouldn't be incarceration but rather receive treatment. Why should someone be punish for something they still haven't done.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...