@9H35HJR6mos6MO
depends o the situation but in some cases focusing on treatment rather than punishment can be more effective in addressing addiction and helping individuals get back on track
@9H3597M 6mos6MO
Yes, I do believe they should receive treatment. If they were non-violent, then they should be given treatment to fight their addiction.
@9H34R8X6mos6MO
Yes I think this would largely benefit most offenders.
@9H357YH6mos6MO
I think they should receive treatment and incarceration. Drugs have been proved to have negative effects on people and to prevent it spreading to the younger generations, drug offenders should be treated and put into incarceration to show a more strict stance against drugs. The younger generation is the hope for the future of our country and we shouldn't expose them to illegal drugs since it would prevent them from being the best version of themselves.
@9H35422Republican6mos6MO
Yes, most drug addicts are victims rather than criminals.
@9H354GK6mos6MO
They should receive treatment rather than incarceration because they are non-violent
@9H35GLW6mos6MO
No they should not. They have still used illegal drugs, which are grounds for incarceration. Just because they were non-violent in one situation does not mean they will continue to be non-violent.
@9H356YVRepublican6mos6MO
Yes, because they haven't done anything wrong they just have an issue with using drugs.
@9H35NXS6mos6MO
If the person has truly done nothing to hurt someone than he shouldn't be incarceration but rather receive treatment. Why should someone be punish for something they still haven't done.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...