...as individuals sometimes violate the principles of correct reasoning in favour of emotionalism...
I would first like to point out that "emotion" is not the opposite of logic. That kind of "logic vs emotion" mentality is incredibly silly and often just leads people to ignorantly assume that their own emotional beliefs are somehow "not emotional" but simply based on "facts and logic" alone.
...we need laws of logic in order to ensure we are reasoning correctly...
Sure, in terms of what we consider a "good/sound argument", yes. Again, the laws of logic are still merely the most basic of baselines for establishing objectivity within an argument, but "reasoning correctly" is still an incredibly odd way to phrase this. There are many different ways to argue, and not all of them are "correct" (whatever that even means to you).Are you thinking of "correct reasoning" as like a formatting thing or something? What's an example of "correct" vs "incorrect" reasoning to you?
History demonstrates that it is the tendency of humanity to be irrational and emotional...
Based on what? "Irrational" according to whom? Again, what are you considering "irrational" vs "rational" here, and what does being rational even have to do with the laws of logic? If I spend money on something I enjoy, instead of saving that money...is that "irrational"? What is the argument there? What laws of logic does "being irrational" supposedly violate? It feels like you have taken this so far off the issue that we're not even referring to the same things anymore.
I cannot but express dismay that you believe morality is some subjective, relativistic convention contrived by man.
Because it is. Morality is literally nothing more than the personal belief system of what each and every individual personally believes is justified or not. What exactly is objective about that?
That is literally the… Read more
@9CJ6CB64mos4MO
Dear god what kind of crap’s going on?
@VulcanMan6 4mos4MO
lol this kid is arguing that morality is objective because god made it, as well as arguing that the laws of logic prove the existence of his god. Just the typical fundamental christian arguments...
@9CJ6CB64mos4MO
Ah yes, an argument that claims it has empirical evidence yet pulls up nothing but fluke historical timelines. Everytime someone says their religion is the “one true religion” I ask them what makes them have proof enough to say that.
@VulcanMan6 4mos4MO
lol and then he has the audacity to consistently accuse me of "begging the question"; meanwhile, his entire premise is "god says it, therefore I'm right".
Him and I have had plenty of arguments on here, but this is probably the longest and most ridiculous of them...
@9CJ6CB64mos4MO
I mean, I had one with them on if Hitler was a leftist. It’s still amazing to me that they really think he was left, he’s literally the furthest right in history, making a corporatocracy under a theocratic fascist society. Nothi my says far-right more than that.