Answers + Nuclear Energy + Science

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.

Answers + Nuclear Energy + Science

Sort by

Filters

Options

Not necessarily, I think we should rely more on alternatives but I know that that, can also be difficult.

Yes, and increase funding and subsidization for 4th Generation nuclear options such as IMSR and LFTR as examples.

Yes, with stricter safety guidelines and regulations that MUST be followed by workers at nuclear plants to decrease like…

YES, and heavily incentivize the building and deployment of 4th Generation nuclear reactors like IMSR and LFTR for examp…

Yes, if the Price-Anderson Act is repealed, the industry is privately insured, and there is no government subsidy.

Yes, we should invest in all sorts of energy sources including wind, hydroelectric, thorium, geothermal, and fossil fuel…

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About