Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MBBM3H from Pennsylvania answered…7mins7m

We should turn already existing abandoned buildings into homes for the homeless instead of tearing them down

 @9MB8CT5 from Wyoming answered…2hrs2H

yes but not every public property. designate areas where public camping would be allowed as well as providing proper bat…

 @9MB7CRL from Texas answered…4hrs4H

Yes, only if it is ensured that the buildings will be responsibly managed and not be owned by corporate landlords

 @2YWMS7X answered…7hrs7H

Yes, and deploy all of the various strategies for harnessing development to public benefit in a uniform and transparent…

 @9MB332M from New Mexico answered…10hrs10H

it honestly depends on the shelters or housing available, Because sometimes living on the streets is better for some peo…

 @9MB2MTP from Indiana answered…10hrs10H

I think it depends on the area. You don't want it over-crowded. Also, doing that could raise property taxes. I think ran…

 @9M9ZZQL from California answered…11hrs11H

They should be refused if their reasoning about not going to the shelter is due to drug use or other illegal actions ins…

 @9M9XZTW from Virginia answered…13hrs13H

Only in communities with low population. Most of the people in the US already live in just half the states. This will he…

 @9M9XYG8 from California answered…13hrs13H

How about we focus on improving our healthcare system so that we can take the homeless from the streets and into treatme…

 @9M9VZGD from Oregon answered…15hrs15H

Depends on the state of the shelters, if they're better off sleeping on the streets they should be allowed to stay there…

 @9M9V2MD from New York answered…16hrs16H

No, but we should create incentives for multi-familing buildings (apt. bldgs) to rent out a portion of units (ie

 @9M9V2MD from New York answered…16hrs16H

No, but we need to do better about creating better shelter/housing options for these people so they don't feel as displa…

 @9M9TL26 from Texas answered…16hrs16H

Not on Public Property, but the government should create some programs and provisions that will help them to get some jo…

 @9M9RXT5 from Oregon answered…17hrs17H

There shouldn't be so many in the first place. Wouldn't be a problem if they didn't make it so difficult for people to n…

 @9M9RTHF from Washington answered…18hrs18H

More should be done to assist homeless individuals via physical and mental health evals and hiring programs to help them…

 @9M9RNL7 from California answered…18hrs18H

no but we shouldn't be eager to not hlike providing help them we should aim to help in any way we can like providing foo…

 @9M9QSTV from New York answered…18hrs18H

Maybe they should build a public area just for homeless so if they don’t want housing they may camp there

 @9M9NQW8 from Indiana answered…19hrs19H

I believe that the real issue is the fact that people are afraid of the possibility of getting kicked out of shelters or…

 @9M9MQTT from New Mexico answered…19hrs19H

Yes, but the buildings should still be of quality living conditions, not made for parking as many people as possible in…

 @9M9MHN7 from South Carolina answered…20hrs20H

i think there should be more places for them to live, have food, clothing and medicine for free so they can live

 @9M9M9Q5 from North Carolina answered…20hrs20H

Even if they refuse shelter, we cannot keep them on the street. So, I'd say to give them shelter or housing even if they…

 @9M9M77M from Missouri answered…20hrs20H

Yes, but not everywhere. Allow specific areas of public property for encampments and regularly provide drug addiction su…

 @9M9M5TN from North Carolina answered…20hrs20H

It depends on what their condition is but if they want to live in the streets then knock yourself out.

 @9M9LB2W from North Carolina answered…20hrs20H

yes but no, it is wrong as they have been offered shelter and by staying outside they "contaminate" the view of the city…