No, GMOs are the most promising solution to ending world hunger

Although production on GMO's would help to sustain people in need, there is no way that we could prove that it would be cost-effective and/or taxed unfairly. Manufacturing food with lower nutritional values and higher chemical rates would leave consumers with less enegy intake that it would with Non-GMO foods. We should put funding into better agricultural resources with more product and less chemicals.

We should not be putting fake stuff into our bodies. Every one who visits Europe say they eat so much and never gain any weight because they have farm to table implemented.

GMO are more harmful to health then they are an advantage to ending or reducing hunger. Healthier food options should be made more available and at a more affordable price.

I am not advocating for the reduction of GMO food production I just would like to know what I am putting in my body when I go to the grocery store

There is no best solution to ending world hunger, but manufacturing food with low nutritional value and more chemicals and non-consumable foods and giving them to people in need isn't the best solution. More funding should be put into agriculture to help produce more vegetables and fruits, which are a way better alternative than the plastic food today.

America is one of the most obese countries with one of the highest GMO rates. GMOs and preservatives are creating food that is horrible for the gut and overall health. GMOs are not a healthy solution to world hunger.

Producers should be required to label GMOs in their foods. I feel like people should know what they are putting into their bodies no matter what.

It's fine if people want to eat GMO food just label it in stores so peole who don't GMO food can buy non-GMOs

GMO Labels should exist that way people have the right to choose wether they wish to consume GMO or not.

There are other ways to ending world hunger. GMO are not real food It is the reason we have the health concerns we do now. there are other ways of preserving food and eliminating world hunger. If the government cans sustain life in space for years in a capsule they can eliminate world hunger.

There is no best solution to ending world hunger, but manufacturing food with low nutritional value and more chemicals and non-consumable foods and giving them to people in need isn't the best solution. More funding should be put into agriculture to help produce more vegetables and fruits, which are a way better alternative than the plastic food today.

GMO are more harmful to health then they are an advantage to ending or reducing hunger. Healthier food options should be made more available and at a more affordable price.

GMOs will only result in the gradual modification of ourselves; “You are what you eat”. Instead energy should be focused on natural agricultural innovations or teaching more people how to make their own food.

We have no clue what is being put in GMO foods. We would be doing more harm by putting unknown substances into the food of people who are already suffering.

No I don't think so there are many other ways to ending world hunger. These processe foods are more hurting then helping.

GMO's are artificial and not natural, and contains many harmful chemicals that could rather worsen the world hunger problem by causing sickness and possible death.

although they are most promising the ingredients can cause harmful unlying issues that can lead to more issues

I think helping people for getting jobs so they can earn money and buy food so they won't be hungry.

We are seeing throughout other countries that without GMOs they are living a much healthier lifestyle. So yes they will fill someone up and "End hunger" but it will lead to more problems in the end.

I feel like ending world hunger would have to require the whole country to change and with the willingness of other countries to provide funding.

Why pit thing on food to kill bugs if it’s malnutrition’s the food itself, makes it less healthy, for looks.
Everyday we get closer to getting man made food instead of earth grown food.
I for the land not the man ✊🏾

Gmo's can increase nutrient value and growing rate in food and consumable products having more value per product.

everyone deserved to know what’s in your food and where it comes from since it’s a juman right in my opinion

GMOs isn't the best solution as they are low nutritional value and more chemical, while processed foods are a lot cheaper than naturally sourced and could help more people get food, they aren't as good to our health.

GMOs cause unforeseeable consequences to not only our health but the health of the planet. While they might allow for better crop output the dangers of these GMOs far outweighs any positives they might have.

GMOs are not the most promising solution to ending world hunger. Moreover, it is not the responsibility of the U.S. to singlehandedly end world hunger. Instead, initiatives should be introduced to critical-aid countries to facilitate better practices within their borders.

i feel processed food is addicting stopping process foods i feel would help get people on a natural healthy diet

why change the diet that our ancestors have been eating for years and all this processed food is ought to be blamed for all the health problems that are on the rise

Processed food is hurting more than helping; and there are other ways to help solve the issue of world hunger.

Hunger is one of the greatest global challenges of the 21st century. Despite some improvements within the last two decades, global hunger is again on the rise, with 2016 data indicating that more than 800 million people around the world suffer from malnutrition.

GMO are genetically mortifying our foods which is starting to become more harmful to the environment and even to people.

The quality of food should be the higher priority.
If GMO can be proven to be healthy and advantageous, great.
If GMO prove to be bigger quantities of lesser quality, we will only increase 2nd and 3rd order health problems.

World hunger isn't a single countries issue. Choosing public health and safety should be top priority. Most natural form of development of agriculture should be the stance.

Are you really ending world hunger and increasing longevity when in the long run you're actually creating cancer?

GMO's time and time again have gotten people sick and have been the leading result in heart disease and other major diseases that people become more susceptible to as they grow older

Then show us how those organisms are created, processed, packaged and the effects of their consumption both in the short term and long term :)

Labels have no effect on the actual effectivness of GMOs in ending world hunger. It is merely a consumer protection so the consumer to make an informed choice on what product they would want to purchase.

The majority and or all the processes and ingredients these genetically modified foods have to go through is banned across Europe and Africa. It would not end world hunger if multiple countries have already declined this ¨offer¨ from the United States.

The only thing thats gonna end world hunger is dropping the price on food and labeling the food that is GMO, Because as someone who only eats real meet I would lose my mind if someone gave me GMO food.

GMO's are bad for you and should not be produced because they lead to health problems down the line and natural food is better

Having GMO's or not, isn't going to make a difference when it comes to world hunger. People who are starving are not going to care what is in their food, they just care that it will fill their stomachs.

None of us really know what is being put into the foods with the GMO's. Yes they are required to but who knows right?! How can you know for sure what people are putting into these things not to mention the sanitary value of the instruments there using to make these products... something could easily get mixed in or fall in, causing deaths of humans.

GMO's have been known to transfer the selected gene into other species. This being said what benefits one plant may harm another.