Try the political quiz

259 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

If you had more freedom to customize your education, what subjects would you add or drop from your curriculum?

 @9L7HMKSDemocrat from Arizona answered…2mos2MO

If I had the freedom to customize my education I would add topics that pertain more to real life such as teaching children about the role of taxes and the aspects of loans and homes. I would drop classes that become less important as you get older since you have already learned more about them like extra science classes, although I do feel like most of the classes we take are important.

 @9L96F29Independent from Illinois disagreed…1mo1MO

Kids barely pay attention in school as it is and “real life” classes that won’t be relevant to the students for years will just become another requirement that is done to check a box and forgotten by the time they need that info.

 @9L7W74V from Utah disagreed…2mos2MO

I would agree with adding classes on personal finance, however dropping classes like science and other STEM subjects should not be the answer. I would say dropping extracurricular classes like religion released time, extra PE, etc. should be more heavily considered.

 @9L7HVJS from Virginia answered…2mos2MO

Math subjects over Algebra 1 shouldn't be required and chosen. At least they are where I am. Electives should not be required either, it's unreasonable for what is supposed to be choice decisions be required chosen decisions.

 @9L7HRD8 from Arizona answered…2mos2MO

I would like to add curriculums that focus purely on certain careers are more skill-specific and involve hands-on learning.

 @9L7HQ9HSocialist from Arizona answered…2mos2MO

There should be mandatory classes in highschool for sociology/statistics.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

If entrepreneurs had more freedom from government restrictions, how would this affect your future job prospects?

 @9KCQ2W5Independent from Missouri answered…3mos3MO

It would affect mine a good amount for my job that i want to do

 @9KCY7KT from California disagreed…3mos3MO

Government restrictions are probably there for a reason, and they should help unemployed job searching people, instead of hurt them

 @9KCQ3VH from Georgia answered…3mos3MO

Probably would be better by letting companies have more control over who they hire - makes the market more free.

 @9KHC6LH from Texas disagreed…2mos2MO

Companies already have the choice in hiring who they want, having more freedom from restrictions will not chance this aspect of it.

 @9KCQ47N from Missouri answered…3mos3MO

 @9KCPJ6V from Texas answered…3mos3MO

I think it would give America a little more of a chance to get people off the street.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How do you think a reduced foreign aid budget might affect global perception and relations?

 @9KLVQ88Republican from Oklahoma answered…2mos2MO

Spending money first at home on our own would help steer any future issues to help anyone foreign or abroad

 @9KLY83Pagreed…2mos2MO

If you provide aid to a nation that is known to be of bad standing that could cut off ties with other nations that we do business with.

 @9KLVBZXIndependent from Illinois answered…2mos2MO

 @9KLTLQJ from Illinois answered…2mos2MO

It might make it look like we are being selfish but at the same time we need to focus son ourselves and help the citizens of the U.S

 @9KLWMNV from North Carolina answered…2mos2MO

The US has always been used as an international police force. This should be funded in some portion by those that receive aid. Global perception and relations will initially be hurt because many countries are use to receiving free assistance.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would your family adapt to a world where healthcare management is more in your hands?

 @9LH34TW from Pennsylvania answered…1mo1MO

It would be a lot more stressful and annoying to have to figure out which healthcare plan is going to screw us the least.

 @9LH32CBWomen’s Equality from Illinois answered…1mo1MO

It would be amazing, more freely to take care of ourselves without the interference of the government. like with abortions

 @9LH2WRHWomen’s Equality from Illinois answered…1mo1MO

I feel that the government should do more funding for families with this so we can have more freedom with our healthcare.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Could minimizing mandatory curriculum standards provide more room for creativity in the classroom, or would it be chaotic?

 @9KCPGFL from California answered…3mos3MO

It could lead to both depending on where it is being held. It's better to have a looser curriculum for younger students and stricter ones for high school but still allow students to have their own creative freedom.

 @9KHBBQ5 from West Virginia disagreed…2mos2MO

Too much freedom will lead to a large disparity in outcome, leaving many students undisciplined and undereducated. Schools should not be focused solely on memorization and noncritical thinking, but too much flexibility will lead too many students wayward. There should be a balance of strict discipline and creative problem-solving, and this should apply at all levels. Children need to be disciplined, perhaps even more than the older students. If they're not, they'll be problems when they become those older students.

 @9KFW6P3 from Oklahoma disagreed…3mos3MO

I do not see why these are mutually exclusive. I think it is very possible for an academic institution to foster both high curriculum standards and foster creativity.

 @9KCPFK4Green from California answered…3mos3MO

I support a s testing ground to see what will and won't work.

 @9KFFT3J from Wisconsin disagreed…3mos3MO

This is part of the movement that allows students to get out of working hard and finishing their requirements.

 @9KCPGKL from California answered…3mos3MO

It would be more chaotic because there should be things that all must learn

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How could your school be different if it wasn't subject to as many federal or state regulations?

 @9HZJBGZRepublican from California answered…4mos4MO

 @9HZJ87M from North Carolina answered…4mos4MO

We should have the right to have a say in regulations that are put in place

 @9HZJ7MVLibertarian from California answered…4mos4MO

Education wouldn’t be as developed and students might not be able to attend base in discrimination.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Imagine paying less tax but receiving fewer public services; does that seem fair to you?

 @9H784MX from Nevada answered…6mos6MO

Government exists to provide protection for its citizens against enemies both foreign and domestic. It exists to enact and enforce laws that are beneficial to the citizenry at large. The absolute minimum should start there. I suspect if Government was forced to spend based on those principles, we would be far better off for it.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How do you think a 'small government' approach might influence education and the opportunities it provides?

 @9HGTNQZ from Massachusetts answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What could be the pros and cons of entrepreneurs running former government services?

 @9HZGVXF from California answered…4mos4MO

It could support them, there would be less nationalization of certain government services

 @9HZGSR3 from California answered…4mos4MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Do you think volunteer work could replace some government services in your community?

 @9J59JKW  from Utah answered…4mos4MO

 @9HTPC9BRepublican from Washington commented…4mos4MO

yes i think if the community stepped in more then things could be a little bit diffrent

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How might your daily life be impacted if public services like garbage collection were privatized?

 @9J4VJD8answered…4mos4MO

Government helps the people with lots of services that we take for granted, and without this help our society would look drastically different.

 @9J4VC4NIndependent from Florida answered…4mos4MO

I feel as if in this example, it wouldn’t necessarily affect me in any sense.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you think a small government would lead to a better or worse education system for our country?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Should the government step back and let the free market decide our environmental future?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...