It's understandable to want gun companies to be more responsible for the actions of their customers. However, placing liability solely on the manufacturer could have unintended consequences. For example, if a person misuses a gun in a way that is not covered by the manufacturer's safety guidelines, but the company is held liable, it could set a dangerous precedent for companies in other industries. Additionally, it could lead to higher prices for law-abiding gun owners, who would end up shouldering the cost of the manufacturer's legal fees. What do you think could be a better solution to ensure responsible gun ownership?
