Should there be more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun?
They should make gun companies more liable for crimes committed by their customers, so they will be…
However, placing liability solely on the manufacturer could have unintended consequences. For example, if a person misuses a gun in a way that is not covered by the manufacturer's safety guidelines, but the company is held liable, it could set a dangerous precedent for companies in other industries. Additionally, it could lead to higher prices for law-abiding gun owners, who would end up shouldering the cost of the manufacturer's legal fees. What do you think could be a better solution to ensure responsible gun ownership?
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.