Converation thread

You sir have just said something completely, totally, 100% false. Gay people aren’t interested in “making kids gay” NEARLY as much as straight people turning gay kids straight. Observe the fact that conversion therapy has been extremely prevalent in the last few decades.

They aren't interested in making kids gay, despite being involved in massive parades through the streets, faces painted rainbow colours, chanting "WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR KIDS! WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR KIDS!" and funding drag queen story hours at public libraries to indoctrinate children into homosexuality and gender ideology, or the fact that they demand a month where sane members of society are forced to pay homage to these morally bankrupt scumbags? You certainly wouldn't think it, but thanks for pointing that out!

That chant was literally started by a critic at a pride parade, and he was one of the only people actually chanting it. That was also one of thousands in America, so yet again, as you won’t stop rambling about before, this is the fallacy of hasty generalization. Drag queen story hours are kept surprisingly tame for a reason, it’s like hiring a clown or a member of the circus to read books, not a p0rn star strutting inside of an elementary school. For the love of all that is holy, stop thinking that they’d gain anything at all from “mAkInG tHe KiDs GaY”, the purpose of SOME events is to inform, not indoctrinate, while the rest aren’t targetting anyone in particular at all.

So then by that very logic, Trump is being 100% truthful in every statement he makes claiming he’ll attack everyone else for no reason and without restraint. OR, hear me out on this, they did that to mock the groomer panic conjured into existence as a tool to devalue their voice?

Another straw man fallacy – is this the seventh time you've used that now? – claiming I said trump is 100% truthful in every statement he makes, which is obviously false and I never once claimed the contrary.

No, I am not claiming that, but you have a propensity to trust Trump’s words as mere jokes long before a crowd of random people at a pride parade mocking conservatives. I am not saying you believe him entirely as much as that it would be reasonable to surmise that, by your distrust of their mocking, that one with that same type of skepticism would take trump seriously when he threatens his opponents.

Trump has nothing to do with this discussion, we were talking about a gay pride parade chanting that they were coming for individual parents' children, and, in stereotypical leftist fashion, when it became clear your position could not be held long under logical scrutiny, you brought Trump into the discussion to muddy the waters. I don't know if you think I received this information FROM Trump, but if you do, you're wrong, I saw it myself and discovered it myself, without the 45th President having anything to do with it. I will not here discuss the merits of Trump, here we are…  Read more supposed to be debating the legalisation of same sex marriage and whether the LGBTQ cultists want to come after children and indoctrinate them or not, but because I clearly won that debate, you've now resorted to emotionalism to make yourself feel better. Consider this argument resolved if that's all you can come up with.

I am not trying to highlight trump I am trying to highlight your hilarious amount of distrust and hasty generalization as a flaw in your own logic, trusting the word of a mocking chant over the VAST majority of the actual LGBTQ+ population. Same-sex marriage harms no one, and benefits the most people to allow, and regardless of how pure one’s religion might view it as, that doesn’t mean that one’s religion trumps that of their own personal choices. It’s an extremely rare thing that any LGBTQ+ person actually WANTS to “come after your children”, and the main…  Read more reason that the drag story hours happen is because people asked them to, and the story hours are not mandatory, nor are they even common. They’re kept tame, and are pretty much never an actual problem. You’ve hastily generalized literally over 10% of the planet as “cultists” because they even get within five feet of kids.

Did I ever claim the "Vast majority" of the LGBTQ cultists wanted to come after my children, or are you fallaciously putting words in my mouth to debunk an argument I never made? And you did, indeed, argue that I only believed what I did because of Trump, look up at your previous comments if you've already forgotten. You're begging the question again by claiming same-sex marriage harms no one, and benefits people in fact, when that's the very point in question. You've used drama and emotionalism to claim I think 10% of the planet is a cultist because they get within five feet of kids, I actually said they were cultists because they reject the biological facts of nature, which I have established with evidence above...