https://foxnews.com/us/armed-homeowner-who-defended-family-in-dr…
California temporarily suspended the concealed carry license of Los Angeles homeowner Vince Ricci after he opened fire on two armed suspects who ambushed him at his front door.
In a video for the National Rifle Association, Vince Ricci said his concealed carry license was 'revoked' after he was attacked by two men at his $2million house.
'After successfully defending my home and my family and my five-month-old child, California has now decided to suspend my Second Amendment [rights],' Ricci said.
Obtaining a concealed carry permit in California is more difficult than other states with Ricci telling Fox News Digital it took him months to process it.
In California residents over the age of 18 can legally carry firearms on private property and residences without a permit or license.
'My situation is unique because it happened at my front door, all on camera,' he said. 'But this happens time and time again all over the country…
'People sweep it under the rug because it doesn't behoove their political agenda. The fact is, evil will always exist.'
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Is it fair for a state to suspend an individual's gun license if they use their firearm in self-defense within their own home?
@9H3N9YF6mos6MO
It is wrong for the state to suspend his gun license sense he used it for self-defense and it goes against the second amendment.Overall he was using his gun to defend him and his family, he most likely did not plan on hurting the other person.
@9H3MMJ66mos6MO
It is both prudent and morally justifiable to limit one's access to firearms while they are being investigated for a crime.
@9H3MLWB6mos6MO
No, because they were being harmed and attacked so they used their guns to defend them. So I believe they shouldn't.
@HumanRightsPup6mos6MO
A man doing the correct thing, protecting his family is punished but others who do the wrong thing are let go free and clear! Our current government is evil!
@RightistDeerLibertarian6mos6MO
2A limits the government from doing that, yet here we are just letting them. Any state, county, or city/town that does not abide by the Constitution and Amendments should be taken to court
@HumanRightsPup6mos6MO
He doesn't need a permit. The Constitution affords us all the right to keep guns. It doesn't say those with permits.
That falls under infringement... but of course so does the 'permit' which is nothing more than an tax to keep the poor from gun ownership, and track the ones that can afford it.
@SincereCardinal6mos6MO
Permits prevent illegal gun carrying about as well as our southern border prevents illegal entry into the country.
@LyingLion6mos6MO
Took his permit away because he "yelled" at the police officers because he thought they were half assing the investigation.
@SincereCardinal6mos6MO
They're more interested in stopping his conceal permit than catching any criminals.
@LyingLion6mos6MO
This is the State reminding us of our place and the privileges it extends to us. The State no longer serves We The People.
The State doesn't protect our rights. A piece of paper called the Constitution doesn't protect our rights. Judges don't protect our rights.
We do.
@9H3SQM8Libertarian 6mos6MO
Our Constituion is clear. Our right to defend ourselves is granted by GOD not man.
@9H3RSVT6mos6MO
It is his right and his own thing
@9H3PNKD6mos6MO
I think that is crazy he was defending them
@9H3NGLYLibertarian6mos6MO
It was in defense, why is he getting his protection taken away?
@9H3MTS86mos6MO
encroachment of the 2nd amendment.
The historical activity of users engaging with this url.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
