Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

U.S. Runs Out Of Patriot Air Defense Missiles

  10

 @9LYL2G2 from Minnesota answered…2hrs2H

There should be a clearer delineation between military actions that require a quick response from the military under the…

 @9LYHV3D from Washington answered…4hrs4H

Yes, every minute matters, and if the president can authorize the military to attack then that could be the difference b…

 @9LYD7YQ from California answered…8hrs8H

only if we cooperate with the Mexican officials that work against Cartels and the US stops buying and trafficking guns w…

 @9LY95GL from Florida answered…10hrs10H

The president should be able to make a quick decision but congress must approve or deny within 30 days, if they deny it…

 @9LY7846 from Arkansas answered…11hrs11H

Al-Qaeda isnt a state/government, IE: the president should be allowed to use military force againts them as with the Bar…

 @9LY74S8 from Nevada answered…11hrs11H

I believe there should be a line drawn; if it is crossed, then yes. If not, then no. Congress has become a zoo and not…

 @9LY6QJL from Connecticut answered…11hrs11H

Somewhere in the middle. Need to be able to act fast but only when circumstances warrant it. Very tough to say on this o…

 @9LY59WL from Washington answered…12hrs12H

the US should work with the Mexican government to crack down on the cartels however all drugs should be legalized but he…

 @9LY3VKG from Washington answered…12hrs12H

I do not understand what this means so I feel I don't have a right to pick yes or no when I don't understand.

 @9LY2KDH from Michigan answered…13hrs13H

Congress should approve all military conflicts but in a timely manner to make quick action when necessary, if it is the…

 @9LY27YK from Indiana answered…13hrs13H

yes, but only in specific situations where a quick response in needed, but some kind of discussion should still be held.

 @9LXZ2MB from Michigan answered…13hrs13H

They should try their hardest to capture, interrogate, and imprison them first. Killing should be a last resort.

 @9LXYHP5 from Texas answered…13hrs13H

He should only be allowed if Al-Qaeda calls for war onto our whole country and it comes down to the last second. Until t…

 @9LXWQZC from Connecticut answered…14hrs14H

Yes, We should if it comes to extreme measures and American soldiers are being attacked and we aren't doing anything abo…

 @9LXWQK4 from Alabama answered…14hrs14H

Yes, but only because congress likes to prevent things, good or bad, from happening for their own personal gain.

 @9LXWN75 from North Carolina answered…14hrs14H

There must be evidence that the person is actually planning a terrorist attack so that the US won't kill possibly innoce…

 @9LXTPKV from Louisiana answered…15hrs15H

Depends on how big of a threat that they could be to us and what could happen if we do assassinate that person in the ot…

 @9LXS3NW from North Carolina answered…15hrs15H

I feel like we should all be able to come up to some kind of an agreement to keep the peace, but i also feel like we mus…

 @9LXRR4Y from New York answered…16hrs16H

The president should have the right to act quickly, but does not have the right to put us into a unnecessary war or conf…

 @9LXLT96 from Pennsylvania answered…18hrs18H

No because we cant just send our people into another country trying to kill people that'd start a war or something