Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…17hrs17H

White House Says "No Genocide" Happening In Gaza

  27replies

 @9MGY83T from New Jersey answered…6hrs6H

If we were attacked yes. If a conflict is erupting or on going and we are backing up our allys yes we should have congre…

 @9MGW62T from Florida answered…10hrs10H

Estados Unidos son los que controlan los carteles mexicanos que quieren que se acabe su venta de dinero negro o prefiere…

 @9MGV2XM from Massachusetts answered…11hrs11H

if you were to assume someone's a terrorist it doesn't change the fact they could possibly chance they aren't a terroris…

 @9MGTPL7 from California answered…12hrs12H

No, it’s a waste of money. Focus on keeping cartels out of the country and legalize drugs like weed.

 @9MGSRDY from North Carolina answered…13hrs13H

The gov. should go after Mexican drug cartels if they're operating within our borders, done by the Fed. Gov.. But we sh…

 @9MGSRDY from North Carolina answered…13hrs13H

This depends if Al-Qaeda or other terrorist organizations are exasperated of planning a attack on the US gov or The Peop…

 @9MGRCK5 from California answered…15hrs15H

It would be optimal to discover their intentions before coming to a consensus for punishments, if any.

 @9MGR35K from Minnesota answered…15hrs15H

I'm conflicted, as on one hand, we should be quick to respond to major threats, but it's also hard to give one man all t…

 @9MGNTM3 from Montana answered…17hrs17H

while stopping terrorism is a good thing, in the resulting conflicts we murdered countless innocent civilians

 @9MGLQFT from North Carolina answered…18hrs18H

I have two views on this, we should because the cartel needs to be taken out but no because they are so big that we woul…

 @9MGL3BT from Oklahoma answered…18hrs18H

It is in America's interests to maintain law and order on both sides of our borders. As such, the US military should wo…

 @9MGL3BT from Oklahoma answered…18hrs18H

Congress should approve all military conflicts against legitimate nations, but have oversight over anti-terrorist action…

 @9MGKDBW from Washington answered…19hrs19H

They should first be taken and imprisoned if there are only undeniable plans, but if action has been committed and it's…

  @RoryAveryJs from Illinois answered…19hrs19H

No, but completely nationalize border patrol and make addresses to illegal immigration humane and fair

  @RoryAveryJs from Illinois answered…19hrs19H

Only use our military for self defense; no occupation in other countries unless war was declared by the enemy country or…

  @RoryAveryJs from Illinois answered…19hrs19H

Only use our military for self defense; no occupation in other countries unless war was declared by the enemy country or…

 @9MGHX5D from West Virginia answered…19hrs19H

This is a yes and no question, because it would depend on who the current president is. If we are answering for Biden, t…

 @9MGHBPH from Pennsylvania answered…20hrs20H

No, it's difficult to see how allowing the president to authorize military force prevents terrorist attacks.

 @9MGG8MC from Michigan answered…20hrs20H

and how are you supposed to do that? its been since the 1970s, why does my opinion change the fact that you are useless…

 @9MGF9D7 from Florida answered…21hrs21H

Yes, but only if absolutely necessary and with undeniable evidence otherwise, capture and imprisonment