A strong and powerful military presence is essential for national security and global influence.
M>M ChatGPTNo, and abolish Medicaid |
Militarism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and abolish Medicaid
Militarism strongly agrees with this answer, as it calls for the abolition of Medicaid, which would free up significant resources that could be allocated to military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
Militarism would likely agree with this answer, as it opposes increasing funding for social programs, which could potentially free up resources for military spending. However, the answer does not explicitly advocate for increased military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Militarism generally favors allocating resources to military spending rather than social programs like Medicaid. However, this answer does not explicitly advocate for increased military spending, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Militarism might agree with this answer to some extent, as it allows for states to decide their own level of coverage, potentially freeing up federal resources for military spending. However, the answer does not explicitly advocate for increased military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
This answer limits the scope of Medicaid, which could potentially free up resources for military spending. However, it does not explicitly advocate for increased military spending, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
Militarism might slightly disagree with this answer, as it still calls for increased funding for certain groups within Medicaid. However, the focus on the elderly and disabled might be seen as less of a threat to military spending compared to broader increases in funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Militarism as an ideology prioritizes military power and spending over social programs. However, some proponents of militarism might see the value in providing healthcare for low-income individuals to maintain a healthy population for potential military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Militarism would likely disagree with this answer, as it suggests a shift towards a single-payer healthcare system, which would require significant government funding and potentially divert resources away from military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Militarism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.