Neo-Libertarianism

Agree

Yes

Neo-Libertarianism, which blends libertarian principles with a proactive foreign policy and an acceptance of a minimal welfare state, might see congestion pricing as a market-based solution to reduce traffic and pollution, aligning with their acceptance of minimal government intervention for public goods. However, their strong emphasis on individual freedom and skepticism towards government-imposed fees might temper their enthusiasm, leading to a moderately positive view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While Neo-Libertarians value individual freedom and might initially resist the idea of government-imposed congestion pricing, their pragmatic acceptance of minimal government roles in addressing issues that affect the public good (like traffic congestion and environmental pollution) could make them less opposed to it than traditional libertarians. Their support for free-market principles might also make them see congestion pricing as a way to efficiently allocate road space, a scarce resource, but their skepticism of government intervention moderates their opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.