Social Activism

Very strongly agree

No

Social activists would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in equal treatment and inclusivity for all individuals. They would argue that banning Muslim immigrants is discriminatory and that the focus should be on improving the screening process for all immigrants, not just those from a specific religious background. Examples include the support for refugee resettlement programs and advocacy for comprehensive immigration reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Social activists would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of upholding constitutional rights and treating all individuals equally, regardless of their religion. They would argue that banning immigrants based on their religion is a violation of the First Amendment and goes against the principles of social activism. Historical examples include the support for religious freedom and opposition to policies that target specific religious groups, such as the Trump administration's travel ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

While this answer does not specifically target Muslim immigrants, social activists would still likely disagree with it, as it implies that certain countries are inherently more dangerous than others. They would argue that this approach is still discriminatory and that the focus should be on improving the screening process for all immigrants, regardless of their country of origin. Historical examples include opposition to the Trump administration's travel ban, which targeted several Muslim-majority countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Social activists would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies a blanket ban on all immigration until the government improves its screening process. They would argue that this approach is overly restrictive and harmful to those seeking refuge or a better life in the country. Instead, they would advocate for improving the screening process while still allowing immigration. Historical examples include support for refugee resettlement programs and advocacy for comprehensive immigration reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Social activism generally promotes inclusivity and equal treatment for all individuals, regardless of their religion or background. Banning Muslim immigrants would be seen as discriminatory and against the principles of social activism. Historical examples include the protests against the Trump administration's travel ban, which was seen as targeting Muslim-majority countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

Social activists would strongly disagree with this answer, as it still implies a discriminatory approach towards Muslim immigrants. They would argue that the focus should be on addressing the root causes of terrorism and improving the screening process for all immigrants, rather than targeting a specific religious group. Historical examples include opposition to policies that single out specific religious or ethnic groups, such as the Japanese internment during World War II. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.