Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
r>r Personal answerHow many children go to bed each night without even the physical forms of love provided to them? One is too many. How about the emotional scars of the terror and fear that they feel, not experiencing the bonding of a loving relationship? One is too many. How many children never play, because they are in survival mode? One is too many. Expand your thinking to the globe. Does it not appear obvious to you that this "survival mode" is scarcity, which creates a "groping" for life, and dare I say, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Is not love more important than other peoples' beliefs about what others "should, could, or must do" ... to match "their" beliefs. The question is intuitively obvious, unnecessary, and redundant. |
Social › Abortion
r>r Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child |
Social › Gay Marriage
r>r Personal answerHow dare anyone preclude love from manifesting in any form? An elephant loves her child? A man loves a man. A woman loves a woman. So what. Again, the paradigm is overly simplified. We, each of us, is a part of life. Life is an attempt to manifest our interpretation of God into life, here on earth. This is called "goodness". As I choose to be good, in each and every aspect of "my" life, then, I can increase that manifestation of goodness for my lover, mu partner, my niece, my step-brother, my passed mom & dad, a flower, the earth, the resources which provide us the essence of life: food, air, water, shelter. Any and all commitments to the act of Love shall be condoned, supported, and respected. |
the Economy › Equal Pay
r>r Personal answerIt is nigh impossible to say that one person has the exact same credentials as another. This is the beauty of a diverse society. The boxes in which we all find ourselves limit our thinking, hence our actions. The coming together of multiple perspectives gives the opportunity to learn from one another, to listen, to ponder, to reflect, to probe, to become greater than the sum of the parts. It is the prefect opportunity to show that "1 + 1 = 3". How does the phrase go? "When two or more are gathered in many name, there I am!" Who is that "I"? Is it some 3rd person? Or, is it two who have intentionally come together to solve an apparent problem, realized that the apparent problem is really a symptom, who discuss, dialogue, listen, ponder, pray, whatever verbs you want to use ... but ... somehow ... they get so committed to creating a solution that ... somehow ... something bubbles up ... and a new way arises. Some people say: "by the grace of God." I prefer to imagine rough seas on a local lake calming, as steps are taken to let the wind be, pay attention to the safety of all, await the winds, check to see that everyone is now able to come out, and let all be together in gratitude for the journey which just occurred, lick each others wounds (metaphorically), and continue forward to the goal and vision that each of us can imagine, see, remember ... whatever word you'd like to use. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
r>r Personal answerAll people, at the right time in their lives, need to become competent in the use of weapons. Are these video games to simulate murdering people in a war game? Is it any form of weapon? Then, words are weapons. They create fear, which, if acted upon, could result in "taking away one's life", a constitutional right. How does it work in Switzerland? Compulsory weapons training. Guns permitted to go home with the transition back to private life. No ammunition permitted, except in very controlled environments. Consider Japan. An unbelievably challenging training program to insure competence, concurrent with no authority to carry a gun. The solution comes from the "win-win" way of seeing life. What is the absolute best system throughout the world. Multiple dialogues. Much listening. Maybe even a "Future Search" for what is really wanted and needed? Maybe a separation of the hungers from the wants from the needs. Maybe the Israeli model? Bottom-line, the goal is to create the best-of-the best, rather than the least of the worst. Remember fractions: greatest common multiple, as compared with the greatest common divisor. |
Crime › Police Body Cameras
r>r Personal answerThey shall be required to always use body cameras. The video shall be provided to the public within 24 hours of the incident. |
Healthcare › Drug Price Regulation
r>r Personal answerYou continue to make a myriad of apparently alternative responses, none of which are comprehensive. Medicine is not social. It typically is toxic drugs to apparently effectively deal with symptoms, yet do not offer a cure for the cause of the multitude of symptoms which emerge from the disruption of the normal state of affairs of a healing human being. Medicine should not be socialized. Healing should be commenced. Symptom reduction puts skin cream over the pimple. It covers up the apparent symptom, while not addressing the plugged pore. One looks pretty, yet still has the cause of the symptoms within. Nutritional? Emotional? Mental? All of the above? None of the above? Once corporations are rechartered and have the Hippocratic Oath as their "rasion d'etre", many, many symptoms disappear, and resources are available to create another positive feedback loop, one of healing of all symptoms, by gently addressing the three symptoms of the problem: the underlying fear, the frozen emotions, the outdated game plan to deal with the more recent reality, and a vision of a strategy which will attain the goal of healing of the Self, rather than the palliation of the symptoms. Our time is NOW: not yesterday, not tomorrow, not Tuesday, November 8th. Our time is NOW! |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
r>r Personal answerA business can no longer be a busy-ness. The needs, wants, desires, and preferences of any business must subordinate to the 1st aspect of the Hippocratic Oath: "do no harm." One, anyone does not have the right to preclude respect for any other humane being (spelled intentionally with the additional "e" at the end of the word.) One who is attempting to be goodness in form, may never be precluded from expanding his or her life's goals, missions, or actions. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
r>r Personal answerTough dilemma. Need to be fair, accurate & complete. |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
r>r Personal answerSame miss-understanding as #1, above. To minimize pain, and maximize education; planned parenthood must be expanded, along with education, through service, to give experience, from which citizens can be more whole, and shift to another level in their personal life. At this point, funding would automatically subside, as experience harmonizes with understanding, and much more comprehensive personal decisions are made by each and all of us. |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
r>r Personal answerWe, all people, have different strengths and opportunities for improvement. We, each of us, is just slightly different from the next. How dare one say that a minister of some form of church has less value than a physicist, or more value than a McDonald's cook. Will any of the above externally defined rules permit each to perform the best that they (we) are able to, throughout our lives? Will the pain that many of carry ever permit us to reach any of our potential? What is the statistic: 22 vets a day commit suicide? Really? This is not what they bargained for, when they signed on the dotted line to serve their country, their families, their lovers, with their lives! I happen to be a disabled vet, so I pray daily that I will not be one of those statistics. Yet, step back a bit. Why are there wars of the wallet? Can we each be justly compensated for our actions towards a better life, for each of us? Must our thinking expand to see different forms of abundance? Must the system be re-designed? Must the "richest" earn no more in total compensation, that say, 50 times the salary of the lowliest employee in their firm? Think even broader. Can "Wall Street" be "them", and we, the multitude be "us"? Must we be at war with one another? No. War is an outdated form of I must take care of "me", at "your" expense. The people I lived with in Sri Lanka were unbelievably happy, although they were poor. A thatched roof over their heads. 10 people in a 3 "room" house. How could they be happy? They each held as their goal the unity of their family. They would survive and succeed together, or they would die trying. Yet, they would not die. They would change form! To what, none of us knows. Yet, in their journey, they had life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Yet, their search in the last topic was not towards the external. It came from their mutual remembrance of their connection to one another. They were each in love with life. They were poor, yet lived in abundance. This raising of the fe |
the Environment › Climate Change
r>r Personal answerGovernments are a historic tool to manage the pain created by previous ignorant decisions. If all organizations choose to do no harm, then, the answer is obvious. At some point, governmental action would be unnecessary. Until that time, regretfully, the "contra-positive" way of thinking of 10th grade geometry must be used to induce evil people or corporations, to act for the common good. To reverse their short-sighted positions, and reverse the spelling of their adjective "evil" to "live". The Robin Hood principle applies. The "it takes a whole community to raise a child" principle applies. Education comes from the latin root "eduucare". This means to remind, that is re-mind. This suggests that someone has forgotten an honorable path, and must be reminded, with additional information, with application of guilt, of public humiliation, of whatever means are for the common good, to redirect short-term organizations towards the horizon, and success for all. |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
r>r Personal answerEach human deserves to be gifted with the love of their parents, whatever their "look." Yes, all parents deserves to raise their children, in love, and be supported for that gift to the community of the planet. We thinking strategically, and in the long-run. And, we act as if there IS no time, and we all go forward at the same time. We are one of two countries in the world who do not offer this as a part of the "education" system. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
r>r Personal answerPer previous thoughts, drugs may be the "numbness" offered to be able to deal with the pain of Life. So, let's truly question: Is alcohol a drug? How about ice cream? Wheat? Eggs? Carphentinol? Video games? Couches? Desk chairs? Fast Food restaurants? Now, pause & think? Some people are allergic to some of the above substances. They may prolong the symptoms which the person is experiencing. Yet, from the belief system of the person, the drug is an ally, not an enemy? Would not the results of the present behavior prove to the person that the "drug" is not helping? Yet, how van a hurting person be logical, rational, and objective. External assistance is required. As more lethal drugs are replaced with a love culture, and the external behavior more and more aims towards service to all ... as this occurs, the need for the drug diminishes to some sort of a balanced, steady-state. Does not the experiment with street drugs in Seattle, WA suggest much more help, and hope, than the private prison system which runs for profit, the profit of the management and shareholders, not the inmates. At some point, may our vision trance-reform our present thinking to a more compassionate public health model. This model, by the way has an amazing increase in the "work force", humane beings, serving the pained, so that they ... that we ... may come to health more fully. The positive feedback loop of drug use and symptom management dissolves, as people are heard, honored, respected, a conversation occurs, and people subtly and in a nuanced manner, turn on an inner light, and walk out of their darkness. |
Education › Student Loans
r>r Personal answer"The pursuit of happiness" statement of the Constitution mandates fair and reasonably priced access to the tools which will permit that pursuit. A contented and challenged employee for the good of all peoples will be the most productive, because their own life becomes a stake in the work. So too, for those who receive excessive salaries", excessive withdrawals from the accounts of citizens and their children, whose taxes are required to correct the poor management and design of the corporate near-sighted policies of the entity which precludes the credible attainment of even the pursuit of happiness, let alone the attainment thereof. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
r>r Personal answerAt this point in time, you already know the answers that I type into this computer. Marijuana is a drug? Or, is it an attempt to reduce the pain? Would I be comfortably numb? If, and only if, I believe that this lifestyle is the absolute best that I can ever achieve, and that there is no hope for improvement, or growth, or behavior change, or changed circumstances, or, quite a few other items. Look again at alcohol. It was prohibited. Illegal alcohol was produced in many, many places. People would have their "fix", no matter what is done to attempt to stop them. This desire is a symptom of the problem, not the actual problem. Again, consider the Seattle, WA model. Even consider the direction of the Ithaca, NY drug strategy. Both projects attempt to accept people where they are, sick, in pain, and wanting to move forward, yet many can't conceive of forward movement ... YET! Is not a social worker in the medical establishment exactly the same "function" as a policeman or woman who connects with a drug addict, hears them, offers them no legal problems, and treats them as a humane being who is in pain, starving at some level, and needing expanded options? Is this the real discussion with marijuana, and quite a few other drugs? As a trivial example, how did high fructose corn syrup come in the American diet? Did it really take 15 years to find out that is is for a healthy body? Really? That's almost as crazy as thinking that the migration fro CFC's to their present form, by a certain Company, with all of the associated health and environmental costs was for the public good. Heck no, it was for the shareholder's pockets. Damn the environment, full speed ahead. Well, we weren't astute enough to make certain points that could be heard! Has this not happened to YOU, with your mom, dad, sibling, friend, or even an acquaintance? Do we demand reparations for the presently known consequences of the previous ignorant or evil actions, because the effects have significantly decreased the possibility that we |
Social › Government Mandates
r>r Personal answerHealth insurance providers must be de-commissioned, and only permited to return to the world of commerce if, and only if, their goals are guided by the same Hippocratic Oath. NOT to maximize profit for the stakeholders. Yes to maximize benefit to the most amount of life, in their temporary purview. Birth control is a pseudo-choice, within the context of a person's existing belief system, at one given point in time. That perspective must expand to a timeless context. What is best for the whole: for me, the offspring, the family, the community, the planet? What action will best bring this instant of creation through the power of goodness, call it sexual activity, adoption, or whatever ... to make the best decision for each and all. Robin Hood guides us here: "one for all, all for one." |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
r>r Personal answerIf and only if the vaccines have been testes, and no serious side effects occur, 1at <95% confidence level. |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
r>r Personal answer34. Is the process kind, good, gentle and in the highest honor. |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
r>r Personal answerWith a few arrows now in our quiver of tools, we reframe the question. How can a coal miner be placed into poverty, because he or she has served the fuel industry, whose purported intent is to offer heat to all of us. The heat is not for the sole benefit of the share holders, as noted above. It is for the land which is destroyed. It is for the health which is stolen from the workers being slowly killed by coal dust. It is for honoring the "canary in the mine", which says: There is a major problem here. Long term reality will be that the coal will be mined out. The environmental costs will be extensive. The gain in short term coal for fuel, is outweighed by the costs to the environment, to workers' health, and to the entire planet. Hello! A redirection is required. Now, not in 4 years, or 10 years, or 50 years: now. The archer must draw another arrow, no longer sin and miss the bulls' eye. He and she must re-aim, remember the long-term goal: love incarnate for all, through gentle, nuanced, kind action for all. One needs to remember that missing the mark, in the Christian vocabulary is sinning. Nothing bad, just not yet perfect! So, we all aim for perfection, we all get "there" sooner. And, paradoxically, "there" is "here." |
Elections › Campaign Finance
r>r Personal answerIF ... I, a United States citizen can not have my vote honored and respected, when I say "none of the Above" meet my minimum standards for being President and Vice President of these United States ... THEN ... no other non-human entity (meaning any corporation or entity) make speak THEIR "mind" in the election. They may not act and use any of their resources (having been earned from the public to serve the public's good) to market for ANY of the candidates. |
Elections › Voter Fraud
r>r Personal answerSince there is concern about voter fraud, an age-old, time-tested strategy should be immediately invoked ... again ... and, possible ... for the first time. A voter signs his name adjacent to an existing signature on a voting ward form. Belief systems of some, who want to retain a segregated society, and who have not yet learned the meaning and implementation of the word diversity, shall not prevail. Any identification process purports to validate the integrity of the individual who purports to be voting. Yet another issue is not even considered! In the 2016 Presidential Primaries, about 63 million people voted in the Republican and Democratic primaries. There are about 226 million potentially registered voters. Here's the reality. 28% of the eligible voters gave us the apparent two candidates which we are forced to vote for. That means that 72% of the population is precluded from having any say of who could be their candidates. They have trusted a system which has failed for them. In fact, there are 6 states in which it is illegal to write in any candidate. Illegal! I'm guessing that none of the States acknowledge the possibility that the primary process has failed, and that a "None of the Above" write-in would cause a constitutional crisis! Just for the heck of it, suppose that the potential voter pool of 226 million only reached 200 million registered and eligible voters. Suppose that 100 million voters do not see the Democratic or Republican candidates as trustworthy, wise, intelligent, truthful, honorable, respectable ... whatever adjective you might want to use. This would mean that 100 million people would select no-one for President or Vice President. the other 100 million would split quite probably amount the 4 top candidates: Republican, Democrat, Green & Libertarian. Now there are 100 million people who left the President's position and the Vice President's position un-marked. The four parties split the vote. Let's say that Jill Stein wins. Let's say that she gets the most, |
the Economy › Government Spending
r>r Personal answerTransform the national debt. The first word is respelled: trance-form. Expand the thinking. Self-educate. Better remember our goal, the best for all. Concurrently from both within AND without. Do you remember the CCC, the Civilian Conservation Corps? The Great Depression, FDR, a vision of serving the whole, national parks, infrastructure, serve the whole. No longer, serve the hole! It's an unnecessary typo! Is the Peace Corps enough? Is Vista enough? Not quite. Each of us needs to consider, just like the McDonald's manager above: does she DESERVE a break? How can I assist and serve? Is the Public Health Service enough? Are the military services enough? Is the NOAA Commissioned Corps enough? Is pay as a short-term assistance to get back on one's feet honorable? Can it be administered and designed fairly? Can someone who hurts, concurrently receive and give back ... knowing they as they heal, others heal because of them? I say: yes. Is the justice system a hodge-podge of previously written laws, possibly written good intentions, yet whose essence has been lost for the whole so that those who are presently in pain, want to cover it up (just like an addict), can ONLY see covering up their pain as the only solution to the huge symptom of missed education? Might it be possible for some amazing law students to cross reference all laws to come up with a system which is fair for all? I think: yes. Do you remember "County Farms"? These were places where people were given a place to stay, and food to eat, in exchange for service on the farm, which raised food for the community to get better. |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
r>r Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
r>r Personal answerWhy are we here, now, in the first place? Possibly because, as earlier proposed, that we are presently living within and under the previously encoded laws and rules of a former time, when hearts were no so open to the intention of life, and control was codified into law, to "preclude rule by the people, for the people?" How does one go back to the beginning of time, and apologize (with appropriate & corresponding actions) to rebuild trust, so that we, together, can go forward? |
the Economy › Welfare
r>r Personal answerThere are not benefits. There are short term loans to regain one's composure and return to serving the whole. There must be an exchange of benefits to serve one, along with that person's commitment to serve the whole. |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
r>r Personal answerThe answer must be integrated with the words: compassion, fairness, healing of the public , generosity, gratitude, education (meaning a learning experience for all involved), and love. A combination of answers (1), (6), (7) and (8) aim in a more close manifestation of the above words. Why do so many drugs affect so many of us? My co-journeyor, Deepak Chopra, wrote a book: "What are you really hungry for"? He suggests that we are each starving at different levels in our being: physically, emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. And, many of the forms of behavior that are exhibited are "sub-optimal" manifestations of behavior which appear to solve the hunger. A wall will not solve the symptom. Addressing the cause of the symptoms is the issue. Is an alcoholic a bad person? Or, is he, or she, someone who is in pain, can't figure out how to get out of that pain, and numbs the pain of their life with alcohol? Is the book "Comfortably Numb" , by Charles Barber, only the tip of the iceberg? Is the sub-title an indictment of the symptom: "How Psychiatry Medicating a Nation"? In actual fact, are not all external attempts to experience love a sub-optimal attempt to find love within oneself? The issue is not drugs, it is the inability to experience love. This is an education issue, not a police issue. Offer the opportunities to be ... to be alive ... and the symptoms disappear. One might say, "Oh yeah, one person at a time". Yet, can you conceive of 330,000,000 (three hundred thirty million members of the US population ... imagining ... pretending ... starting to act ... AS IF ... they might "pay it forward" ... meaning offering some small piece of their life for another? Somehow, I'll get you to see the story of a McDonald's manager in Texas who gave $1,000.00 to a woman he'd just seen having her car repossessed. No strings attached. The woman happen to be African American with four children. The man, Caucasian with two children and one on the way feeling so appreciative of what he had been gifte |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
r>r Personal answerYes, and they should also be eligible for financial assistance and scholarships |
Education › Common Core
r>r Personal answerIt becomes necessary to separate the "intention" of the national standards from the implementation by each of the states. This is another variation of the "what" and the "how". If the intentions are not congruent between the national standards and each of the States, then chaos will continue to ensue, and students will lose. Is this change worth while? Who was the man who said something like: "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana? Is a set of data to be transferred to each student? Or, does each student choose the HOW they will attain the goals co- determined by the instructor with the student(s). Again, education's root is educare. This means to re-member, as if something is already known, and it just needs to be brushed off, used, brought to conscious awareness, and expand behavior more in harmony with the concepts re-discovered. |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
r>r Personal answerComments have been made previously which attempt to show the short sightedness of each of the questions above. Minimax theory was the label in my mathematics training for picking the best path to cause the least amount of pain. This is a "win-lose" game. A "win-win" game means that all are so trusting of the processes put in place for our "structure", that we all aim towards the same goal ... goodness for any and all to experience, grow into, and live abundantly. Quite probably, a major conservation program, a major shift to complementary fuel sources (wind, solar, tidal) would eliminate the need to answer the above question. |
Healthcare › Obamacare
r>r Personal answerHealthcare is a symptom of people in pain, who do not know how to return to a healthy state of affairs. Once in pain, all forms of healing must be available to the person, knowing that their belief system will guide them to the venue of healing that best meets their present ability to heal of the symptoms. Obamacare and the insurance company model are based on a model of thinking which is mostly limited to the physical symptoms which appear due to underlying symptoms not being addressed. Since we each can hear only from where we ARE, the form of healing must be individualized, just like the concept of individualized education, which permits standards to be maintained, and the speed of progression through the learning process is totally up to the "student", or, fellow journeyer. |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
r>r Personal answerAs a prerequisite to becoming a candidate for both President, Vice-President, and ALL lower federal, state and municipal governmental elections, the candidate is to be required to provide all previous tax returns through the previous tax year, and an estimate for the present year, prior to being considered as a candidate for that office. |
the Environment › Fracking
r>r Personal answerMore, for us, the ignorant is no longer an option for life, while there are over seven billion humans alive, well, at least, doing their best to survive, in spit of way too many hindrances. The earth is one such "entity". Without her resources, managed sanely, we all perish. Maybe this is a bit too dramatic. There is the distinct possibility that the pain created by people being in survival (due to a mis-distribution of income, and resources) will continue to mandate the multitude of wars which appear to be caused by other symptoms. The derangement of the water system due to fracking is obviously detrimental. One only has to think about the waste which is returned to the land, or driven away to another site. We will not win be being addicted to the outside. We have much to learn from the American Indians and all peoples of the native world. We all need to be educated (reminded) from whatever place in our awareness and experience that we presently reside in. More is not only NOT better. The intention of that word more is abundance, a transformation of life from survival to peace, love, happiness, at-ease-ness. One only has to add a few words to the word: a-bun-dance. See the nude man or woman riding away on a bicycle down a forest path. Smile at the beauty. Remember the beauty of life. Appreciate the beauty of life. Resolve to commit the remainder of your seconds in this form, called human life, to expanding your experience to everyone in your personal world. And, let the infinite "points of light" shine together, in community, to re-educate us all, to aim towards that goal. All the time, we are being compassionate with one-another, as we change our course towards a good life ... for each and all of us. No longer are we the violin player on the Titanic, being a professional, guiding people to their life rafts ... when the company designed the ship with too few life rafts, and too many people ... innocent and honorable people, went to their next stage in life, commonly called death. They went d |
Science › Nuclear Energy
r>r Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Torture
r>r Personal answerMore. Will the unintended consequences of torturing behaviors cause more unintended consequences that using them? How are we meeting the intentions of the Laws of the Geneva Convention? Is this behavior acceptable under the International Bill of Rights? |
Science › GMO Labels
r>r Personal answerGMO foods are a pertubation of nature. We know little to noting about the intentions of the DNA & RNA structure. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
r>r Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
r>r Personal answerAre not caught foreign terrorists give rights according to the International Declaration of Human Rights? If not, why not? If so, who enforces these rights in the country noted? |
Science › Space Exploration
r>r Personal answerOnly in the atmosphere, for offense & defense, and research. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.