Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Equal Pay
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
Social › Gender Identity
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
4>4 Personal answerNo, all customers deserve to be treated equally |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Climate Change
4>4 Personal answerYes, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerNo, we have a drug problem in this country and it's not likely due to the fact that people just want to break the law to use drugs. That being said, making it criminal is only costing tax payers money in retaining individuals that made poor choices, but are still susceptible to using when they are free, if we spent the same amount ensuring that people recover and educating others on the dangers and effective ways of coping with life, then we'd all be better off. One bad decision shouldn't ruin your life, but it should turn it around. |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Immigration › Immigration
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Education › Student Loans
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Social › Death Penalty
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for medical use |
Social › Confederate Flag
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only at historical monuments where it was originally flown |
Social › Government Mandates
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerYes, but that alone won't stop someone who has ill intentions from carrying out an act of violence, guns are not the only danger AND the list due to the PATRIOT Act I am sure doesn't preclude people from being incorrectly placed on the list without the right to appeal. |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo, it seems like a waste of time and a large liability to have such data available (something someone who wants to use data like that maliciously would want it). It seems it would make more sense to target the suspects we're interested in for the means of National Security and do that to just them. Criminals aren't stupid though - if they know that this information is being tracked they'll find other ways to plot. |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
4>4 Personal answerYes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Medicaid
4>4 Personal answerYes, but spend a portion of the increase on educating those on Medicaid about preventing diseases like diabetes, quitting smoking and other preventative measures that can lead to a reduction in spending later. |
Immigration › Border Security
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
4>4 Personal answerYes, the government should support more sustainable energy technologies |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
4>4 Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerYes, if they pay taxes |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Voter Fraud
4>4 Personal answerNo, and automatically register every citizen to vote when they turn 18 |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
4>4 Personal answerYes, but limit the scope of the government’s powers |
the Economy › Government Spending
4>4 Personal answerNo, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead |
Foreign Policy › Israel
4>4 Personal answerRemoving support could have unintended consequences, but in general this seems like a scheme. |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
4>4 Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country |
Social › First Amendment
4>4 Personal answerNo, as long as it does not reference a specific religion |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
4>4 Personal answerNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
4>4 Personal answerYes, and we should create more social programs to help prevent and rehabilitate criminals |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount |
Social › Euthanasia
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only if they are in unbearable pain, they have had a psych exam AND faced their loved ones and family to tell them this is what they chose and why. |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Labor Unions
4>4 Personal answerHelp |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
4>4 Personal answerNo, increasing the capital gains tax will limit investment in our economy |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
4>4 Personal answerYes, as long as they pay taxes |
Education › Common Core
4>4 Personal answerYes, I support the concept but not the current implementation |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Fracking
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
Healthcare › Obamacare
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for public projects and never for private projects |
Foreign Policy › Torture
4>4 Personal answerNo, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
4>4 Personal answerNo, but we should discuss a plan with China to prevent them from using a long-range nuclear missiles. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerIncrease, but only for countries that have no human rights violations |
Foreign Policy › Drones
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
4>4 Personal answerYes, people are now living longer than when the program was created |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
4>4 Personal answerNo, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture |
Foreign Policy › War on ISIS
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Science › Space Exploration
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
4>4 Personal answerYes - I believe in a free country, BUT - I think we could make it such that it isn't advantageous to invest in offshore accounts. People who are going to break the law are going to break the law no matter what the rules/laws are, it's the "abiding citizens" who are looking for loopholes that make this even worth discussing, these are people who have a considerable amount of money and are trying to live in this country but avoid supporting it by paying taxes as they should. |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
4>4 Personal answerIt should be audited, but the Congress would just add more hands to the pot - it should be another independent entity that is not subject to lobbying or reelection. |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerNo, spying on our allies severely damages our reputation abroad |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should not get involved |
the Economy › Property Taxes
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Pension Reform
4>4 Personal answerYes, but only for future workers |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answerSomething like this may be inevitable, but there should be more research regarding its use as an approved currency prior to adopting it. |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
4>4 Personal answerNo, there are too many hidden provisions in this specific agreement |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.